PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMBHX vs. DCDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMBHX vs. DCDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX) and Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UMBHX

1D
0.29%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DCDGX

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.08%
YTD
19.26%
6M
17.18%
1Y
37.04%
3Y*
17.51%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
13.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMBHX vs. DCDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UMBHX and DCDGX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMBHX vs. DCDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMBHX

DCDGX
DCDGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DCDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DCDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMBHX vs. DCDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX) and Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UMBHX vs. DCDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMBHXDCDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.70

0.33

+2.37

Drawdowns

UMBHX vs. DCDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMBHX drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum DCDGX drawdown of -56.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMBHX and DCDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMBHXDCDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-56.02%

+54.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.80%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-14.93%

+14.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

Volatility

UMBHX vs. DCDGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMBHXDCDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.77%

21.92%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.77%

25.67%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

24.78%

-0.01%

UMBHX vs. DCDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMBHX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than DCDGX's 2.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMBHX vs. DCDGX - Dividend Comparison

UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DCDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCDGX
Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund
5.65%6.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%29.30%22.33%2.06%38.51%20.51%0.00%11.22%
UMBHX
Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMBHX and DCDGX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMBHX and DCDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer