PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMBHX vs. ACWDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX) and AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UMBHX

1D
0.29%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACWDX

1D
0.46%
1M
2.53%
YTD
14.81%
6M
1.48%
1Y
21.35%
3Y*
12.86%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
10.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UMBHX and ACWDX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMBHX vs. ACWDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMBHX

ACWDX
ACWDX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ACWDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX) and AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMBHXACWDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.70

0.45

+2.25

Drawdowns

UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMBHX drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum ACWDX drawdown of -38.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMBHX and ACWDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMBHXACWDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-38.86%

+37.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-10.05%

+9.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

Volatility

UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMBHXACWDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.77%

21.37%

+3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.77%

21.93%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

23.39%

+1.38%

UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMBHX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWDX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Dividend Comparison

Neither UMBHX nor ACWDX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWDX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.74%0.00%2.04%58.27%4.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%
UMBHX
Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, UMBHX and ACWDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMBHX and ACWDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer