UMBHX vs. ACWDX
UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) and ACWDX (AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. UMBHX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for ACWDX.
Performance
UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UMBHX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWDX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 21.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.73% |
ACWDX AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMBHX and ACWDX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMBHX vs. ACWDX — Risk / Return Rank
UMBHX
ACWDX
UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX) and AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UMBHX | ACWDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.70 | 0.45 | +2.25 |
Drawdowns
UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMBHX drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum ACWDX drawdown of -38.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMBHX and ACWDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMBHX | ACWDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -38.86% | +37.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -10.05% | +9.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.52% | — |
Volatility
UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMBHX | ACWDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.77% | 21.37% | +3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.77% | 21.93% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.77% | 23.39% | +1.38% |
UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMBHX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWDX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
UMBHX vs. ACWDX - Dividend Comparison
Neither UMBHX nor ACWDX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWDX AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 2.04% | 58.27% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, UMBHX and ACWDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for UMBHX and ACWDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer