PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMAX.TO vs. PYF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMAX.TO vs. PYF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) and Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMAX.TO achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than PYF.TO's 3.37% return.


UMAX.TO

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.39%
6M
6.66%
YTD
8.91%
1Y
13.74%
3Y*
9.58%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.94%

PYF.TO

1D
0.48%
1M
1.88%
6M
4.06%
YTD
3.37%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
4.77%
ALL TIME*
4.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$195.64KCA$163.45KCA$428.75K
CA$9.06MCA$6.45MCA$5.30M

UMAX.TO vs. PYF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UMAX.TO
Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
8.91%9.90%5.99%0.18%
PYF.TO
Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF
3.37%5.45%7.42%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between UMAX.TO and PYF.TO is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023

0.26

The correlation between UMAX.TO and PYF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMAX.TO vs. PYF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UMAX.TO
UMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PYF.TO
PYF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PYF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UMAX.TO vs. PYF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) and Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UMAX.TOPYF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.00

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

5.34

+3.75

UMAX.TO vs. PYF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the PYF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMAX.TO and PYF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UMAX.TO vs. PYF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum PYF.TO drawdown of -20.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAX.TO and PYF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMAX.TOPYF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-20.53%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-2.11%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

-5.57%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

0.00%

-2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

-0.97%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

0.79%

+0.72%

Volatility

UMAX.TO vs. PYF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO) at 1.05%. This indicates that UMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMAX.TOPYF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

1.05%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.56%

2.86%

+3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.74%

3.28%

+4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.84%

5.26%

+3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.84%

6.68%

+2.16%

UMAX.TO vs. PYF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PYF.TO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMAX.TO vs. PYF.TO - Dividend Comparison

UMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.10%, more than PYF.TO's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PYF.TO
Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF
7.04%7.84%7.66%7.47%5.78%5.74%5.69%5.29%5.38%5.83%6.59%
UMAX.TO
Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
14.10%14.85%14.78%6.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMAX.TO and PYF.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UMAX.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UMAX.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for PYF.TO.

UMAX.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while PYF.TO is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for UMAX.TO and 0.78% for PYF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMAX.TO and PYF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer