UMAX.TO vs. EMCL.NEO
UMAX.TO (Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and EMCL.NEO (Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UMAX.TO returned 17.30% vs 48.25% for EMCL.NEO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UMAX.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMAX.TO achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than EMCL.NEO's 28.01% return.
UMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 17.30%
- 3Y*
- 9.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMCL.NEO
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 28.01%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 48.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UMAX.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UMAX.TO Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 10.39% | 9.90% | 5.12% |
EMCL.NEO Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF | 28.01% | 20.46% | 3.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMAX.TO and EMCL.NEO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2024 | 0.05 |
UMAX.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UMAX.TO
EMCL.NEO
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
UMAX.TO
EMCL.NEO
Energy
UMAX.TO
EMCL.NEO
Industrials
UMAX.TO
EMCL.NEO
Communication Services
UMAX.TO
EMCL.NEO
Basic Materials
UMAX.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Consumer Cyclical
UMAX.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Consumer Defensive
UMAX.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Financial Services
UMAX.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Healthcare
UMAX.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Real Estate
UMAX.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Technology
UMAX.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMAX.TO vs. EMCL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
UMAX.TO
EMCL.NEO
UMAX.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) and Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMAX.TO | EMCL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.45 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 3.79 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 13.57 | -1.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMAX.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum EMCL.NEO drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAX.TO and EMCL.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMAX.TO | EMCL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -19.73% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.11% | -13.12% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.84% | +3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -2.57% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 3.62% | -2.15% |
Volatility
UMAX.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) is 2.47%, while Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO) has a volatility of 12.62%. This indicates that UMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMAX.TO | EMCL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 12.62% | -10.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.68% | 20.77% | -15.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.87% | 22.46% | -15.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.70% | 23.00% | -14.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.70% | 23.00% | -14.30% |
Dividends
UMAX.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Dividend Comparison
UMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.79%, more than EMCL.NEO's 10.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCL.NEO Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF | 10.11% | 9.86% | 3.10% | 0.00% |
UMAX.TO Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 13.79% | 14.85% | 14.78% | 6.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UMAX.TO and EMCL.NEO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Global X.
Find the right allocation for UMAX.TO and EMCL.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer