UMAR vs. ZFEB

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB).

UMAR and ZFEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UMAR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Feb 28, 2020. ZFEB is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Feb 3, 2025.

Performance

UMAR vs. ZFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UMAR vs. ZFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March	-0.32%	10.37%
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February	0.00%	6.10%

Returns By Period

UMAR

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 6M: 1.96%
• 1Y: 11.82%
• 3Y*: 11.51%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: —

ZFEB

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 6.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMAR vs. ZFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UMAR and ZFEB have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

UMAR

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March

ZFEB

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February

Return for Risk

UMAR vs. ZFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMAR

UMAR Risk / Return Rank: 82
UMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
UMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
UMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
UMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
UMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 87

ZFEB

ZFEB Risk / Return Rank: 96
ZFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ZFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ZFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ZFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMAR vs. ZFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMAR	ZFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.45	-0.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	3.59	-1.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.52	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	4.21	-2.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.62	19.06	-7.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMAR vs. ZFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the ZFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMAR and ZFEB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMAR	ZFEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	2.45	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	1.75	-0.83

Correlation

The correlation between UMAR and ZFEB is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

UMAR vs. ZFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither UMAR nor ZFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UMAR vs. ZFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAR drawdown since its inception was -11.08%, which is greater than ZFEB's maximum drawdown of -3.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAR and ZFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMAR	ZFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.08%	-3.00%	-8.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.56%	-1.56%	-4.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	-0.84%	-1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.67%	-0.40%	-1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	0.38%	+0.65%

Volatility

UMAR vs. ZFEB - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) at 0.95%. This indicates that UMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMAR	ZFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	0.95%	+1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.84%	1.66%	+2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.65%	2.87%	+4.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.51%	3.01%	+3.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.58%	3.01%	+4.57%