UMAR vs. PQAP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. UMAR is passively managed, while PQAP is actively managed. Over the past year, UMAR returned 14.67% vs 21.47% for PQAP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.

Performance

UMAR vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMAR achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.09% return.

UMAR

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 5.78%
• 6M: 6.56%
• 1Y: 14.67%
• 3Y*: 12.79%
• 5Y*: 7.83%
• 10Y*: —

PQAP

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMAR vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March	5.78%	11.95%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	12.09%	14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between UMAR and PQAP is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.84

The correlation between UMAR and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UMAR vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMAR

UMAR Risk / Return Rank: 89
UMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
UMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
UMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
UMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
UMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMAR vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMAR	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	4.86	-1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.39	8.47	-4.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	2.20	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	15.50	-11.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.77	86.25	-63.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMAR vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is lower than the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMAR and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMAR	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99	4.86	-1.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	1.76	-0.72

Drawdowns

UMAR vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAR drawdown since its inception was -11.08%, roughly equal to the maximum PQAP drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAR and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMAR	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.08%	-10.79%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.61%	-1.39%	-2.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.12%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-0.60%	-1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.65%	0.25%	+0.40%

Volatility

UMAR vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) is 0.82%, while PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that UMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMAR	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	1.02%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.78%	3.09%	+0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.94%	4.45%	+0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.54%	11.03%	-4.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.52%	11.03%	-3.51%

UMAR vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMAR vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

UMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%
UMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMAR and PQAP in my portfolio?

UMAR and PQAP have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UMAR or PQAP?

PQAP has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to UMAR (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMAR dropped -11.08% vs PQAP's -10.79%.

Which ETF is better, UMAR or PQAP?

On 1-year performance, PQAP leads with 21.47% vs 14.67% for UMAR. On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, UMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UMAR or PQAP?

Over the 1-year period, PQAP has performed better with a 21.47% return vs 14.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMAR or PQAP?

PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMAR or PQAP?

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for UMAR.

What is the main difference between UMAR and PQAP?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UMAR and 0.50% for PQAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.