ULTI vs. LQTI
ULTI (REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ULTI charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
ULTI vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULTI achieves a -12.35% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.64% return.
ULTI
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -18.69%
- 6M
- -23.16%
- YTD
- -12.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- 2.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.10M | $2.20M | $1.68M | |
| $651.44K | $766.06K | $1.11M |
ULTI vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ULTI REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF | -12.35% | -38.67% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -0.64% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULTI and LQTI is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULTI vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
ULTI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQTI
ULTI vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF (ULTI) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ULTI | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.07 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ULTI vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULTI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTI and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULTI | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.23% | -3.41% | -50.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.25% | -2.23% | -44.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.84% | -0.99% | -28.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.36% | — |
Volatility
ULTI vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULTI | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.64% | 5.19% | +56.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.64% | 5.92% | +55.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.64% | 5.92% | +55.72% |
ULTI vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULTI has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ULTI vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
ULTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.80%, more than LQTI's 9.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.27% | 7.01% |
ULTI REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF | 94.80% | 14.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULTI and LQTI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for ULTI.
ULTI has the higher dividend yield at 94.80%, compared with 9.27% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for ULTI and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for ULTI and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer