ULTA vs. PLTR
ULTA (Ulta Beauty, Inc.) and PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. ULTA operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while PLTR operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, ULTA returned 6.68%/yr vs 39.00%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ULTA vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULTA achieves a -22.69% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -27.99% return.
ULTA
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- -22.69%
- 6M
- -22.25%
- 1Y
- 1.15%
- 3Y*
- 1.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.00%
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -27.99%
- 6M
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- -5.33%
- 3Y*
- 99.99%
- 5Y*
- 39.00%
- 10Y*
- —
ULTA vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULTA Ulta Beauty, Inc. | -22.69% | 39.11% | -11.24% | 4.46% | 13.76% | 43.59% | 28.84% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -27.99% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULTA and PLTR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.25 |
The correlation between ULTA and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ULTA:
$20.56B
PLTR:
$329.05B
ULTA:
$26.57
PLTR:
$0.89
ULTA:
17.60
PLTR:
144.03
ULTA:
1.75
PLTR:
0.84
ULTA:
1.65
PLTR:
62.90
ULTA:
7.97
PLTR:
38.94
ULTA:
$12.71B
PLTR:
$5.22B
ULTA:
$5.00B
PLTR:
$4.39B
ULTA:
$1.81B
PLTR:
$2.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULTA vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
ULTA
PLTR
ULTA vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ULTA | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.03 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | -0.14 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | -0.25 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ULTA vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULTA drawdown since its inception was -87.89%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTA and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULTA | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.89% | -84.62% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.56% | -38.22% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.56% | -40.61% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.56% | -79.14% | +34.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.82% | -38.22% | +4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.81% | -40.27% | +19.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.13% | 21.23% | -7.10% |
Volatility
ULTA vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) is 9.69%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that ULTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULTA | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.69% | 17.16% | -7.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.04% | 38.32% | -13.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.39% | 50.83% | -17.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 65.44% | -31.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.32% | 69.75% | -31.43% |
Dividends
ULTA vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ULTA nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ULTA vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ulta Beauty, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ULTA vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison
ULTA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 3.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.
PLTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
ULTA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 448.26M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.
PLTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.
ULTA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 340.47M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
PLTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ULTA and PLTR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to ULTA (9.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULTA dropped -87.89% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
ULTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULTA and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer