PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULTA vs. NKE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ULTA vs. NKE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULTA achieves a -22.80% return, which is significantly higher than NKE's -31.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ULTA has outperformed NKE with an annualized return of 6.92%, while NKE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.82% annualized return.


ULTA

1D
0.98%
1M
-12.71%
YTD
-22.80%
6M
-22.35%
1Y
0.01%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
6.92%

NKE

1D
-1.47%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
-31.48%
6M
-33.72%
1Y
-29.54%
3Y*
-24.47%
5Y*
-18.98%
10Y*
-0.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULTA vs. NKE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
-22.80%39.11%-11.24%4.46%13.76%43.59%13.44%3.39%9.47%-12.27%
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
-31.48%-13.83%-29.11%-6.01%-29.04%18.70%40.97%38.09%19.87%24.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ULTA and NKE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2007

0.40

The correlation between ULTA and NKE shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ULTA:

$20.53B

NKE:

$63.63B

EPS

ULTA:

$26.57

NKE:

$1.52

PE Ratio

ULTA:

17.58

NKE:

28.27

PS Ratio

ULTA:

1.64

NKE:

1.37

PB Ratio

ULTA:

7.96

NKE:

4.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

ULTA:

$12.71B

NKE:

$46.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ULTA:

$5.00B

NKE:

$18.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

ULTA:

$1.81B

NKE:

$3.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULTA vs. NKE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULTA
ULTA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ULTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULTA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ULTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULTA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

NKE
NKE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NKE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NKE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULTA vs. NKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULTANKEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.87

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

-0.64

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.00

-1.25

+1.25

ULTA vs. NKE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is higher than the NKE Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULTA and NKE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULTANKEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

-0.78

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

-0.53

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

-0.03

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.41

-0.05

Drawdowns

ULTA vs. NKE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULTA drawdown since its inception was -87.89%, which is greater than NKE's maximum drawdown of -75.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTA and NKE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULTANKEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.89%

-75.19%

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.56%

-46.18%

+11.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.56%

-64.21%

+19.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.56%

-74.64%

+30.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.92%

-74.64%

+9.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.92%

-73.74%

+39.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.80%

-20.91%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.33%

23.65%

-10.32%

Volatility

ULTA vs. NKE - Volatility Comparison

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE) have volatilities of 9.12% and 9.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULTANKEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.12%

9.50%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.72%

29.21%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.17%

38.14%

-4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.27%

35.80%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.30%

32.24%

+6.06%

Dividends

ULTA vs. NKE - Dividend Comparison

ULTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NKE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
3.79%2.53%2.00%1.28%1.07%0.68%0.71%0.89%1.11%1.18%1.30%0.93%
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ULTA vs. NKE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ulta Beauty, Inc. and NIKE, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
3.16B
11.28B
(ULTA) Total Revenue
(NKE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ULTA vs. NKE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ulta Beauty, Inc. and NIKE, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

38.0%40.0%42.0%44.0%46.0%20222023202420252026
40.1%
40.2%
Portfolio components
ULTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 3.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.

NKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.53B and revenue of 11.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

ULTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 448.26M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

NKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported an operating income of 553.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

ULTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 340.47M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

NKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a net income of 520.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ULTA and NKE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NKE has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to ULTA (9.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULTA dropped -87.89% vs NKE's -75.19%.

ULTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.00 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULTA and NKE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer