ULST vs. FUSI
ULST (State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF) and FUSI (American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. ULST is passively managed, while FUSI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ULST returned 4.92%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for FUSI. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ULST charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FUSI.
Performance
ULST vs. FUSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULST achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than FUSI's 2.39% return.
ULST
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.67%
FUSI
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ULST vs. FUSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ULST State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF | 1.24% | 4.80% | 5.23% | 4.46% |
FUSI American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF | 2.39% | 4.85% | 6.19% | 5.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULST and FUSI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2023 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULST vs. FUSI — Risk / Return Rank
ULST
FUSI
ULST vs. FUSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (ULST) and American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF (FUSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULST | FUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.77 | 2.99 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.92 | 12.25 | +4.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 87.49 | 91.02 | -3.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULST | FUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.14 | 6.05 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.50 | 5.57 | -4.07 |
Drawdowns
ULST vs. FUSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULST drawdown since its inception was -6.20%, which is greater than FUSI's maximum drawdown of -0.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULST and FUSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULST | FUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -0.70% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.24% | -0.45% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.54% | -0.70% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.03% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -0.04% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.06% | -0.01% |
Volatility
ULST vs. FUSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (ULST) is 0.18%, while American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF (FUSI) has a volatility of 0.25%. This indicates that ULST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULST | FUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | 0.25% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | 0.61% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65% | 0.90% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.96% | 1.09% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.45% | 1.09% | +0.36% |
ULST vs. FUSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULST has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FUSI's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
ULST vs. FUSI - Dividend Comparison
ULST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, less than FUSI's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSI American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF | 4.85% | 5.28% | 5.98% | 4.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ULST State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF | 4.29% | 4.46% | 5.03% | 4.45% | 1.70% | 0.54% | 1.34% | 2.56% | 2.13% | 1.21% | 0.93% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULST and FUSI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUSI has higher volatility (0.25%) compared to ULST (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULST dropped -6.20% vs FUSI's -0.70%.
On 3-year performance, FUSI leads with 5.97% vs 4.92% for ULST. On fees, ULST is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FUSI has performed better with a 5.97% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULST is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for FUSI.
FUSI has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 4.29% for ULST.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULST and 0.28% for FUSI.
ULST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.14 vs 6.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULST and FUSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer