ULE vs. EEV
ULE (ProShares Ultra Euro) and EEV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets) are both exchange-traded funds - ULE is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/EUR Exchange Rate (-200%), while EEV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ULE returned -2.49%/yr vs -21.99%/yr for EEV. Their -0.33 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
ULE vs. EEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULE achieves a -4.48% return, which is significantly higher than EEV's -35.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ULE has outperformed EEV with an annualized return of -2.49%, while EEV has yielded a comparatively lower -21.99% annualized return.
ULE
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -4.48%
- 1Y
- -2.43%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- -3.01%
- 10Y*
- -2.49%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.95%
EEV
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- 6M
- -24.14%
- YTD
- -35.13%
- 1Y
- -50.21%
- 3Y*
- -29.41%
- 5Y*
- -16.05%
- 10Y*
- -21.99%
- ALL TIME*
- -25.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $291.03K | $257.03K | $533.45K | |
| $30.31K | $35.90K | $64.55K |
ULE vs. EEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULE ProShares Ultra Euro | -4.48% | 25.97% | -11.73% | 5.08% | -15.51% | -15.66% | 14.74% | -8.90% | -13.40% | 23.92% |
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | -35.13% | -43.35% | -8.08% | -13.08% | 37.05% | -4.99% | -48.93% | -30.87% | 24.06% | -49.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULE and EEV is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008 | -0.33 |
The correlation between ULE and EEV shifts across timeframes, from -0.42 (5 years) to -0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULE vs. EEV — Risk / Return Rank
ULE
EEV
ULE vs. EEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ULE | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.81 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | -0.85 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | -1.42 | +1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ULE vs. EEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULE drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, smaller than the maximum EEV drawdown of -99.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULE and EEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULE | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.74% | -99.88% | +27.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.67% | -58.51% | +46.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.95% | -77.51% | +60.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.36% | -81.14% | +43.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.30% | -93.39% | +42.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.71% | -99.86% | +37.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.20% | -93.04% | +46.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 35.01% | -28.86% |
Volatility
ULE vs. EEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) is 2.55%, while ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) has a volatility of 19.23%. This indicates that ULE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULE | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 19.23% | -16.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 45.21% | -37.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.54% | 49.49% | -36.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 40.12% | -24.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 41.76% | -26.69% |
ULE vs. EEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ULE and EEV have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
ULE vs. EEV - Dividend Comparison
ULE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | 7.22% | 5.40% | 4.45% | 3.45% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.34% | 0.38% |
ULE ProShares Ultra Euro | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULE and EEV have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEV has higher volatility (19.23%) compared to ULE (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULE dropped -72.74% vs EEV's -99.88%.
On 10-year performance, ULE leads with -2.49% vs -21.99% for EEV. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, ULE has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ULE has performed better with a -2.49% return vs -21.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULE and EEV have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EEV has the higher dividend yield at 7.22%, compared with 0.00% for ULE.
ULE is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while EEV is Leveraged Equities. ULE tracks USD/EUR Exchange Rate (-200%), while EEV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%).
ULE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULE and EEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer