PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULCC vs. ALGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ULCC vs. ALGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC) and Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULCC achieves a 43.31% return, which is significantly higher than ALGT's 15.02% return.


ULCC

1D
-3.30%
1M
-10.95%
6M
45.47%
YTD
43.31%
1Y
70.03%
3Y*
-9.01%
5Y*
-14.46%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-17.32%

ALGT

1D
-0.94%
1M
-17.35%
6M
10.66%
YTD
15.02%
1Y
103.82%
3Y*
-5.83%
5Y*
-11.80%
10Y*
-1.20%
ALL TIME*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$42.80M$48.19M$57.36M
$27.68M$28.23M$28.77M

ULCC vs. ALGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ULCC
Frontier Group Holdings, Inc.
43.31%-33.76%30.22%-46.84%-24.32%-27.08%
ALGT
Allegiant Travel Company
15.02%-9.40%16.03%23.44%-63.65%-23.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ULCC and ALGT is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021

0.64

The correlation between ULCC and ALGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ULCC:

$1.55B

ALGT:

$1.79B

EPS

ULCC:

-$2.24

ALGT:

-$1.89

PS Ratio

ULCC:

0.28

ALGT:

0.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

ULCC:

$4.15B

ALGT:

$2.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ULCC:

$902.00M

ALGT:

$815.04M

EBITDA (TTM)

ULCC:

-$272.00M

ALGT:

$340.03M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULCC vs. ALGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ULCC
ULCC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ULCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULCC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ULCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULCC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ALGT
ALGT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ALGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ULCC vs. ALGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC) and Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULCCALGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.25

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

2.31

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.19

5.41

-3.22

ULCC vs. ALGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the ALGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULCC and ALGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ULCC vs. ALGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULCC drawdown since its inception was -87.04%, roughly equal to the maximum ALGT drawdown of -86.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULCC and ALGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULCCALGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.04%

-86.01%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.45%

-39.13%

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.38%

-66.91%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.72%

-81.93%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.19%

-62.25%

-6.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.55%

-31.89%

-28.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.86%

16.69%

+8.17%

Volatility

ULCC vs. ALGT - Volatility Comparison

Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC) has a higher volatility of 22.57% compared to Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) at 14.71%. This indicates that ULCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULCCALGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.57%

14.71%

+7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.55%

46.49%

+14.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.41%

64.40%

+21.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.72%

55.21%

+15.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.29%

51.63%

+17.66%

Dividends

ULCC vs. ALGT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ULCC nor ALGT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALGT
Allegiant Travel Company
0.00%0.00%1.27%1.45%0.00%0.00%0.37%1.61%2.79%1.81%1.44%1.64%
ULCC
Frontier Group Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ULCC vs. ALGT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. and Allegiant Travel Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ULCC vs. ALGT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. and Allegiant Travel Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ULCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 683.00M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.4%.

ALGT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported a gross profit of 479.13M and revenue of 732.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.4%.

ULCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -97.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of -7.6%.

ALGT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported an operating income of 81.10M and revenue of 732.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

ULCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -90.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of -7.0%.

ALGT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported a net income of 42.48M and revenue of 732.43M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ULCC and ALGT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULCC has higher volatility (22.57%) compared to ALGT (14.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULCC dropped -87.04% vs ALGT's -86.01%.

ALGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULCC and ALGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer