PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULBI vs. GMAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ULBI vs. GMAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) and Genmab A/S (GMAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULBI achieves a 15.03% return, which is significantly higher than GMAB's -18.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ULBI has underperformed GMAB with an annualized return of 3.10%, while GMAB has yielded a comparatively higher 4.28% annualized return.


ULBI

1D
1.23%
1M
8.40%
YTD
15.03%
6M
14.43%
1Y
-14.99%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
-5.76%
10Y*
3.10%

GMAB

1D
-0.63%
1M
-5.50%
YTD
-18.57%
6M
-19.90%
1Y
9.90%
3Y*
-13.28%
5Y*
-10.53%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULBI vs. GMAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULBI
Ultralife Corporation
15.03%-23.22%9.24%76.68%-36.09%-6.65%-12.45%9.48%3.05%32.32%
GMAB
Genmab A/S
-18.57%47.58%-34.45%-24.87%7.13%-2.71%82.09%35.54%-0.61%-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ULBI and GMAB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2009

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ULBI:

$109.60M

GMAB:

$16.01B

EPS

ULBI:

-$0.49

GMAB:

$4.10

PS Ratio

ULBI:

0.58

GMAB:

1.81

PB Ratio

ULBI:

0.85

GMAB:

2.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

ULBI:

$187.86M

GMAB:

$8.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ULBI:

$43.39M

GMAB:

$8.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

ULBI:

$6.73M

GMAB:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULBI vs. GMAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULBI
ULBI Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ULBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULBI Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ULBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULBI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

GMAB
GMAB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GMAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAB Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULBI vs. GMAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) and Genmab A/S (GMAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULBIGMABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.07

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

0.27

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.58

0.58

-1.16

ULBI vs. GMAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULBI Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the GMAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULBI and GMAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ULBI vs. GMAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULBI drawdown since its inception was -92.90%, which is greater than GMAB's maximum drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULBI and GMAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULBIGMABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.90%

-84.20%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.69%

-32.51%

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.83%

-57.44%

-11.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.83%

-63.10%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.83%

-63.10%

-5.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.14%

-48.52%

-24.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.48%

-31.09%

-32.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.64%

14.86%

+12.78%

Volatility

ULBI vs. GMAB - Volatility Comparison

Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) has a higher volatility of 18.04% compared to Genmab A/S (GMAB) at 12.15%. This indicates that ULBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULBIGMABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.04%

12.15%

+5.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.57%

25.57%

+16.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.63%

34.45%

+23.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.99%

33.47%

+25.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.53%

35.19%

+19.34%

Dividends

ULBI vs. GMAB - Dividend Comparison

Neither ULBI nor GMAB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ULBI vs. GMAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ultralife Corporation and Genmab A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
47.45M
899.32M
(ULBI) Total Revenue
(GMAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ULBI vs. GMAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ultralife Corporation and Genmab A/S over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
21.3%
92.8%
Portfolio components
ULBI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ultralife Corporation reported a gross profit of 10.11M and revenue of 47.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.3%.

GMAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported a gross profit of 834.08M and revenue of 899.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.8%.

ULBI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ultralife Corporation reported an operating income of -215.00K and revenue of 47.45M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

GMAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported an operating income of 225.83M and revenue of 899.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.

ULBI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ultralife Corporation reported a net income of -451.00K and revenue of 47.45M, resulting in a net margin of -1.0%.

GMAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported a net income of 53.20M and revenue of 899.32M, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ULBI and GMAB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULBI has higher volatility (18.04%) compared to GMAB (12.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULBI dropped -92.90% vs GMAB's -84.20%.

GMAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULBI and GMAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer