UJUL vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

UJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UJUL returned 12.38%/yr vs 128.11%/yr for BWET. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. UJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

UJUL vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UJUL achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 1,030.31% return.

UJUL

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 4.86%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 15.02%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: 8.66%
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: 25.30%
• YTD: 1,030.31%
• 6M: 892.97%
• 1Y: 1,640.62%
• 3Y*: 128.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UJUL vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July	4.86%	12.34%	13.84%	11.10%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	1,030.31%	96.22%	-39.21%	14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between UJUL and BWET is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	-0.01

Return for Risk

UJUL vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UJUL

UJUL Risk / Return Rank: 89
UJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
UJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
UJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 94
UJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
UJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UJUL vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UJUL	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	16.89	-14.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.53	6.36	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.92	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	54.19	-50.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.98	142.88	-120.90

UJUL vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 16.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UJUL and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UJUL vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UJUL drawdown since its inception was -14.11%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UJUL and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	UJUL	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.11%	-56.90%	+42.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.98%	-30.64%	+26.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.38%	-56.81%	+45.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-23.78%	+21.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	11.60%	-10.92%

Volatility

UJUL vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) is 0.56%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 25.51%. This indicates that UJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UJUL	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.56%	25.51%	-24.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.98%	88.96%	-84.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.24%	98.53%	-93.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.13%	70.43%	-62.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.91%	70.43%	-61.52%

UJUL vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

UJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

UJUL vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

Neither UJUL nor BWET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UJUL and BWET in my portfolio?

UJUL and BWET have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UJUL or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (25.51%) compared to UJUL (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UJUL dropped -14.11% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, UJUL or BWET?

On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 128.11% vs 12.38% for UJUL. On fees, UJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, UJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UJUL or BWET?

Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 128.11% return vs 12.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UJUL or BWET?

UJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UJUL or BWET?

UJUL and BWET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UJUL and BWET?

UJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BWET is Commodities. UJUL tracks S&P 500, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UJUL and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.89 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.