UIVM vs. XMAW.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.L).

UIVM and XMAW.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UIVM is a passively managed fund by Victory Capital that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index. It was launched on Oct 24, 2017. XMAW.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 10, 2014. Both UIVM and XMAW.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

UIVM vs. XMAW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UIVM vs. XMAW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF	7.49%	45.47%	5.23%	16.79%	-13.31%	11.85%	0.76%	15.29%	-17.41%	2.56%
XMAW.L Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	-2.80%	22.45%	18.54%	23.03%	-19.97%	19.60%	15.68%	26.48%	-9.97%	4.80%

Different Trading Currencies

UIVM is traded in USD, while XMAW.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMAW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than XMAW.L's -2.80% return.

UIVM

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -4.49%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 13.94%
• 1Y: 40.68%
• 3Y*: 22.51%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: —

XMAW.L

• 1D: 3.05%
• 1M: -4.44%
• YTD: -2.80%
• 6M: 0.91%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: 11.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIVM vs. XMAW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAW.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

UIVM

VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF

XMAW.L

Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C

Return for Risk

UIVM vs. XMAW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIVM

UIVM Risk / Return Rank: 95
UIVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
UIVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
UIVM Omega Ratio Rank: 96
UIVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
UIVM Martin Ratio Rank: 93

XMAW.L

XMAW.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
XMAW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XMAW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
XMAW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XMAW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
XMAW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIVM vs. XMAW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UIVM	XMAW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	1.35	+1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	1.89	+1.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.27	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	2.22	+1.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.27	9.13	+5.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UIVM vs. XMAW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the XMAW.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIVM and XMAW.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UIVM	XMAW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	1.35	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.61	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.58	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between UIVM and XMAW.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

UIVM vs. XMAW.L - Dividend Comparison

UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, while XMAW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF	3.31%	3.70%	5.09%	4.35%	3.03%	3.48%	1.63%	3.49%	2.78%	0.15%
XMAW.L Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UIVM vs. XMAW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, which is greater than XMAW.L's maximum drawdown of -33.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and XMAW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UIVM	XMAW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.73%	-25.05%	-17.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-10.44%	-0.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.27%	-18.92%	-9.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.61%	-4.14%	-2.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.85%	-3.87%	-5.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	1.95%	+0.94%

Volatility

UIVM vs. XMAW.L - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.L) at 5.61%. This indicates that UIVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UIVM	XMAW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.31%	5.61%	+1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.90%	9.57%	+1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.22%	16.08%	+0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.26%	15.51%	-0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.18%	15.85%	+1.33%