UITB vs. BIV
UITB (VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF) and BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. UITB is actively managed, while BIV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UITB returned 0.56%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BIV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BIV.
Performance
UITB vs. BIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UITB achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.24% return.
UITB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.56%
- 10Y*
- —
BIV
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
UITB vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | 0.17% | 7.32% | 1.81% | 6.49% | -12.23% | -0.88% | 7.99% | 11.40% | -1.31% | 0.99% |
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | -0.24% | 8.52% | 1.57% | 6.07% | -13.21% | -2.40% | 9.67% | 10.34% | -0.19% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between UITB and BIV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between UITB and BIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UITB vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank
UITB
BIV
UITB vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UITB | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.21 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.52 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 4.60 | +0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UITB | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.19 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.04 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.65 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
UITB vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UITB drawdown since its inception was -17.02%, smaller than the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UITB and BIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UITB | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -18.95% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -3.18% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.44% | -6.07% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.02% | -18.74% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -2.04% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -3.39% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 1.05% | -0.14% |
Volatility
UITB vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) is 1.24%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that UITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UITB | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 1.36% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | 2.90% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 4.06% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.64% | 6.40% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 5.50% | -0.52% |
UITB vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
UITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
UITB vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison
UITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than BIV's 4.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | 4.22% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.09% | 2.41% | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.01% | 3.02% |
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.89% | 3.14% | 2.32% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 3.01% | 2.99% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, UITB and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BIV has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to UITB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UITB dropped -17.02% vs BIV's -18.95%.
On 5-year performance, UITB leads with 0.56% vs 0.25% for BIV. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, UITB has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UITB has performed better with a 0.56% return vs 0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for UITB.
BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 4.17% for UITB.
They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for UITB and 0.03% for BIV.
UITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UITB and BIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer