UIQN.DE vs. CEMT.DE
UIQN.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (EUR) A-acc) and CEMT.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - UIQN.DE tracks the MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix while CEMT.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIQN.DE returned 9.53%/yr vs 4.08%/yr for CEMT.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UIQN.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CEMT.DE.
Performance
UIQN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UIQN.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- 1Y
- 13.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMT.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 6.44%
UIQN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIQN.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (EUR) A-acc | 7.72% | 23.72% | 7.69% | 17.74% | -13.01% | 21.24% | 0.20% | 27.52% | -13.41% |
CEMT.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 17.53% | 5.08% | 14.19% | -18.24% | 19.63% | 1.61% | 28.81% | -14.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIQN.DE and CEMT.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2018 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UIQN.DE and CEMT.DE has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIQN.DE vs. CEMT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIQN.DE
CEMT.DE
UIQN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (EUR) A-acc (UIQN.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIQN.DE | CEMT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 1.10 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 4.03 | +1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIQN.DE | CEMT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.77 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.28 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.37 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
UIQN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIQN.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.48%, roughly equal to the maximum CEMT.DE drawdown of -37.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIQN.DE and CEMT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIQN.DE | CEMT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.48% | -37.66% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.45% | -4.26% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.66% | -14.36% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | -29.23% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.39% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -7.08% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.16% | +1.42% |
Volatility
UIQN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (EUR) A-acc (UIQN.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) at 0.00%. This indicates that UIQN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIQN.DE | CEMT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 0.00% | +3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 0.00% | +10.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.65% | 6.11% | +6.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.49% | 14.61% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 16.11% | +0.15% |
UIQN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIQN.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIQN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither UIQN.DE nor CEMT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UIQN.DE and CEMT.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEMT.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEMT.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UIQN.DE.
UIQN.DE tracks MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix, while CEMT.DE tracks MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UIQN.DE and 0.25% for CEMT.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIQN.DE and CEMT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer