PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIQK.DE vs. UIQ4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIQK.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIQK.DE) and UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIQK.DE achieves a 22.10% return, which is significantly higher than UIQ4.DE's 3.01% return.


UIQK.DE

1D
-1.26%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
22.10%
6M
23.08%
1Y
28.80%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
8.63%

UIQ4.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
2.17%
YTD
3.01%
6M
3.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIQK.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UIQK.DE and UIQ4.DE is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIQK.DE vs. UIQ4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIQK.DE
UIQK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UIQK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIQK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIQK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
UIQK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIQK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

UIQ4.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIQK.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIQK.DE) and UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIQK.DEUIQ4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.75

UIQK.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIQK.DEUIQ4.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

1.27

-0.99

Drawdowns

UIQK.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIQK.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, which is greater than UIQ4.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIQK.DE and UIQ4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIQK.DEUIQ4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.58%

-3.90%

-36.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-0.25%

-2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-0.87%

-13.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.66%

Volatility

UIQK.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIQK.DEUIQ4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.76%

7.67%

+18.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

7.67%

+10.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.90%

7.67%

+8.23%

UIQK.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIQK.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than UIQ4.DE's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIQK.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UIQK.DE nor UIQ4.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UIQK.DE and UIQ4.DE have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UIQ4.DE is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIQ4.DE is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UIQK.DE.

UIQK.DE is categorized as Commodities, while UIQ4.DE is Derivative Income. UIQK.DE tracks UBS CMCI, while UIQ4.DE tracks Euro Equity Defensive Put Write Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UIQK.DE and 0.21% for UIQ4.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIQK.DE and UIQ4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer