UIQK.DE vs. BCFU.DE
UIQK.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds from UBS - UIQK.DE tracks the UBS CMCI while BCFU.DE tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIQK.DE returned 12.61%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for BCFU.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.34% expense ratio.
Performance
UIQK.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UIQK.DE is traded in EUR, while BCFU.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCFU.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIQK.DE achieves a 22.10% return, which is significantly higher than BCFU.DE's 19.04% return.
UIQK.DE
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- 22.10%
- 6M
- 23.08%
- 1Y
- 28.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
BCFU.DE
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 19.04%
- 6M
- 20.49%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
UIQK.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIQK.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 22.10% | -1.67% | 10.72% | -4.23% | 22.43% | 46.71% | -8.90% | 12.48% | -6.36% | 6.32% |
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 19.04% | 5.83% | 11.25% | -8.45% | 23.71% | 43.40% | -7.83% | 9.25% | -3.00% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIQK.DE and BCFU.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between UIQK.DE and BCFU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIQK.DE vs. BCFU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIQK.DE
BCFU.DE
UIQK.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIQK.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIQK.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 4.30 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.75 | 9.99 | -6.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIQK.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.98 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.76 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.62 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
UIQK.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIQK.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, which is greater than BCFU.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIQK.DE and BCFU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIQK.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -25.15% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | -7.03% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.84% | -13.93% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.37% | -25.15% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -3.51% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.71% | -11.04% | -3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 3.03% | +4.63% |
Volatility
UIQK.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIQK.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) at 4.47%. This indicates that UIQK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCFU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIQK.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 4.47% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 12.82% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.76% | 15.29% | +10.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 16.95% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 15.33% | +0.57% |
UIQK.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UIQK.DE and BCFU.DE have an expense ratio of 0.34%.
Dividends
UIQK.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither UIQK.DE nor BCFU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UIQK.DE and BCFU.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.34% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIQK.DE and BCFU.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.34% per year.
UIQK.DE tracks UBS CMCI, while BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity.
Find the right allocation for UIQK.DE and BCFU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer