PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UINF.DE vs. IBC5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UINF.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Inflation Expectations 2-10Y UCITS ETF (Acc) (UINF.DE) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBC5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UINF.DE

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.52%
6M
4.27%
YTD
6.29%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
2.12%

IBC5.DE

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.74%
6M
-0.19%
YTD
-0.00%
1Y
1.13%
3Y*
1.66%
5Y*
-1.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UINF.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UINF.DE
Amundi Euro Inflation Expectations 2-10Y UCITS ETF (Acc)
6.29%-8.21%12.68%1.01%9.16%18.53%-8.28%3.58%5.17%
IBC5.DE
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.00%4.47%0.00%1.38%-14.33%4.96%9.71%5.53%-2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between UINF.DE and IBC5.DE is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018

-0.14

The correlation between UINF.DE and IBC5.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (3 years) to -0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UINF.DE vs. IBC5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UINF.DE
UINF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
UINF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UINF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
UINF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
UINF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
UINF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IBC5.DE
IBC5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IBC5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBC5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBC5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IBC5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBC5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UINF.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Inflation Expectations 2-10Y UCITS ETF (Acc) (UINF.DE) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBC5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UINF.DEIBC5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.05

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

0.51

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

1.10

+1.65

UINF.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UINF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the IBC5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UINF.DE and IBC5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UINF.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UINF.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, smaller than the maximum IBC5.DE drawdown of -18.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UINF.DE and IBC5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UINF.DEIBC5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.94%

-18.53%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-2.19%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.26%

-5.06%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.49%

-18.53%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.58%

-10.18%

+4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-7.05%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.03%

+0.61%

Volatility

UINF.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Euro Inflation Expectations 2-10Y UCITS ETF (Acc) (UINF.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBC5.DE) at 0.96%. This indicates that UINF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBC5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UINF.DEIBC5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

0.96%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.16%

3.07%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.07%

4.20%

+2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.87%

6.25%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.20%

6.30%

+1.90%

UINF.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UINF.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBC5.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UINF.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UINF.DE nor IBC5.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UINF.DE and IBC5.DE have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBC5.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBC5.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UINF.DE.

UINF.DE tracks iBoxx EUR Breakeven Euro-Inflation France & Germany Index, while IBC5.DE tracks Bloomberg US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UINF.DE and 0.12% for IBC5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UINF.DE and IBC5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer