PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIND.L vs. SDIP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIND.L vs. SDIP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (UIND.L) and Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing (SDIP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UIND.L is traded in USD, while SDIP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SDIP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIND.L achieves a 19.78% return, which is significantly higher than SDIP.L's 8.78% return.


UIND.L

1D
2.04%
1M
4.82%
6M
15.76%
YTD
19.78%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
-56.19%
10Y*
10.25%

SDIP.L

1D
0.34%
1M
1.78%
6M
3.79%
YTD
8.78%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIND.L vs. SDIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UIND.L
First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
19.78%7.36%6.74%17.10%-7.58%
SDIP.L
Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing
8.78%27.58%-0.07%5.68%-26.39%

Correlation

The correlation between UIND.L and SDIP.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2022

0.56

The correlation between UIND.L and SDIP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIND.L vs. SDIP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIND.L
UIND.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UIND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
UIND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SDIP.L
SDIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SDIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIND.L vs. SDIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (UIND.L) and Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing (SDIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UIND.LSDIP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

2.83

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.87

6.94

+3.93

UIND.L vs. SDIP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIND.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the SDIP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIND.L and SDIP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UIND.L vs. SDIP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIND.L drawdown since its inception was -99.21%, which is greater than SDIP.L's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIND.L and SDIP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIND.LSDIP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.21%

-34.50%

-64.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-6.44%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.42%

-19.21%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.58%

-2.79%

-95.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.02%

-18.06%

-27.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.63%

-0.07%

Volatility

UIND.L vs. SDIP.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (UIND.L) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing (SDIP.L) at 2.46%. This indicates that UIND.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIND.LSDIP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

2.46%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

8.11%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

10.98%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.79%

17.99%

+29.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3,136.02%

17.99%

+3,118.03%

UIND.L vs. SDIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIND.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SDIP.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIND.L vs. SDIP.L - Dividend Comparison

UIND.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than SDIP.L's 9.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SDIP.L
Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing
9.29%9.39%11.34%12.51%8.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UIND.L
First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.72%3.00%2.90%3.14%3.27%0.02%3.14%3.04%3.14%2.42%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIND.L and SDIP.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SDIP.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SDIP.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for UIND.L.

UIND.L tracks Nasdaq US High Equity Income NTR Index, while SDIP.L tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for UIND.L and 0.45% for SDIP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIND.L and SDIP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer