UIMR.DE vs. H4ZA.DE
UIMR.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and H4ZA.DE (HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR) are both Europe Equities funds - UIMR.DE tracks the MSCI EMU SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while H4ZA.DE tracks the EURO STOXX® 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UIMR.DE returned 9.02%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for H4ZA.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UIMR.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for H4ZA.DE.
Performance
UIMR.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UIMR.DE having a 7.06% return and H4ZA.DE slightly higher at 7.24%. Over the past 10 years, UIMR.DE has underperformed H4ZA.DE with an annualized return of 9.02%, while H4ZA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.
UIMR.DE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 7.06%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 9.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
H4ZA.DE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 15.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
UIMR.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIMR.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 7.06% | 14.40% | 12.70% | 12.99% | -15.85% | 21.22% | -0.84% | 31.79% | -8.67% | 14.91% |
H4ZA.DE HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 7.24% | 22.26% | 13.81% | 22.59% | -8.87% | 23.72% | -2.73% | 30.07% | -11.96% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIMR.DE and H4ZA.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2011 | 0.92 |
The correlation between UIMR.DE and H4ZA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIMR.DE vs. H4ZA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIMR.DE
H4ZA.DE
UIMR.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIMR.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.18 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 1.43 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.08 | 4.85 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIMR.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.98 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.69 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.59 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.41 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
UIMR.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIMR.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.55%, roughly equal to the maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMR.DE and H4ZA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIMR.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.55% | -38.41% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -10.97% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.69% | -16.40% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.63% | -23.26% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.55% | -38.41% | +0.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.50% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -7.84% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.24% | +0.05% |
Volatility
UIMR.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) is 4.46%, while HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that UIMR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIMR.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 4.95% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 12.99% | -0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 15.99% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 17.50% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 18.17% | -1.23% |
UIMR.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIMR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZA.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UIMR.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIMR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than H4ZA.DE's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4ZA.DE HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 2.44% | 2.49% | 5.35% | 2.93% | 2.94% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 2.84% | 3.55% | 2.73% | 2.85% | 2.70% |
UIMR.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 1.57% | 1.86% | 1.91% | 2.26% | 2.80% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 2.61% | 3.34% | 2.69% | 3.34% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, UIMR.DE and H4ZA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UIMR.DE.
UIMR.DE tracks MSCI EMU SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: UBS and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UIMR.DE and 0.05% for H4ZA.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIMR.DE and H4ZA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer