UIMP.DE vs. AW1C.DE
UIMP.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and AW1C.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UIMP.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while AW1C.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500® ESG Elite. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIMP.DE returned 12.35%/yr vs 15.78%/yr for AW1C.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UIMP.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AW1C.DE.
Performance
UIMP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIMP.DE achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly lower than AW1C.DE's 21.11% return.
UIMP.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 6.43%
- YTD
- 14.22%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 14.21%
AW1C.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- 21.11%
- 6M
- 22.20%
- 1Y
- 39.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- —
UIMP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIMP.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 14.22% | -1.33% | 25.94% | 27.84% | -21.40% | 32.84% |
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.11% | 6.94% | 24.89% | 24.93% | -14.50% | 30.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIMP.DE and AW1C.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021 | 0.92 |
The correlation between UIMP.DE and AW1C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIMP.DE vs. AW1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIMP.DE
AW1C.DE
UIMP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIMP.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.48 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.33 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | 4.43 | +3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIMP.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.56 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.85 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.92 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
UIMP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIMP.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than AW1C.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMP.DE and AW1C.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIMP.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -22.40% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -16.86% | +7.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.74% | -22.40% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.74% | -22.40% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -0.12% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -5.82% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 8.90% | -5.99% |
Volatility
UIMP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) have volatilities of 3.98% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIMP.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 3.81% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.52% | 9.14% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 25.24% | -11.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 18.35% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 18.11% | -1.29% |
UIMP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIMP.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than AW1C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UIMP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIMP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while AW1C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIMP.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.42% | 0.82% | 0.70% | 0.75% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 0.97% | 1.03% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, UIMP.DE and AW1C.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AW1C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AW1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for UIMP.DE.
UIMP.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AW1C.DE is S&P 500. UIMP.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for UIMP.DE and 0.15% for AW1C.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIMP.DE and AW1C.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer