UIMM.DE vs. AW1C.DE
UIMM.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and AW1C.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UIMM.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while AW1C.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500® ESG Elite. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIMM.DE returned 10.68%/yr vs 15.78%/yr for AW1C.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UIMM.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AW1C.DE.
Performance
UIMM.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIMM.DE achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than AW1C.DE's 21.11% return.
UIMM.DE
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.94%
AW1C.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 11.53%
- YTD
- 21.11%
- 6M
- 23.44%
- 1Y
- 39.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- —
UIMM.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIMM.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 9.75% | 1.51% | 23.16% | 24.91% | -20.53% | 28.46% |
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.11% | 6.94% | 24.89% | 24.93% | -14.50% | 30.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIMM.DE and AW1C.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between UIMM.DE and AW1C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIMM.DE vs. AW1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIMM.DE
AW1C.DE
UIMM.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMM.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIMM.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.48 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 2.33 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.31 | 4.43 | +1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIMM.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.56 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.85 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.92 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
UIMM.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIMM.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.43%, which is greater than AW1C.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMM.DE and AW1C.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIMM.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.43% | -22.40% | -10.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -16.86% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.60% | -22.40% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.71% | -22.40% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.12% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -5.82% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 8.90% | -6.10% |
Volatility
UIMM.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMM.DE) is 3.21%, while UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that UIMM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AW1C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIMM.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 3.81% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 9.14% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.60% | 25.24% | -12.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 18.35% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 18.11% | -2.61% |
UIMM.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIMM.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than AW1C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UIMM.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIMM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while AW1C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIMM.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.86% | 1.02% | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.42% | 0.97% | 1.27% | 1.60% | 1.91% | 1.94% | 1.92% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIMM.DE and AW1C.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AW1C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AW1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for UIMM.DE.
UIMM.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while AW1C.DE is S&P 500. UIMM.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for UIMM.DE and 0.15% for AW1C.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIMM.DE and AW1C.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer