UIMM.DE vs. ASCH.DE
UIMM.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and ASCH.DE (abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds. UIMM.DE is passively managed, while ASCH.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, UIMM.DE returned 17.72% vs 47.98% for ASCH.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UIMM.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ASCH.DE.
Performance
UIMM.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIMM.DE achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than ASCH.DE's 28.67% return.
UIMM.DE
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.94%
ASCH.DE
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 7.87%
- YTD
- 28.67%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 47.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UIMM.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UIMM.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 9.75% | 6.99% |
ASCH.DE abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF | 28.67% | 17.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIMM.DE and ASCH.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.69 |
The correlation between UIMM.DE and ASCH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIMM.DE vs. ASCH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIMM.DE
ASCH.DE
UIMM.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMM.DE) and abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF (ASCH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIMM.DE | ASCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.55 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 4.32 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.31 | 15.34 | -9.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIMM.DE | ASCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 2.97 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 2.98 | -2.14 |
Drawdowns
UIMM.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIMM.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.43%, which is greater than ASCH.DE's maximum drawdown of -11.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMM.DE and ASCH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIMM.DE | ASCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.43% | -11.06% | -21.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -11.06% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.61% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -1.77% | -3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 3.12% | -0.32% |
Volatility
UIMM.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMM.DE) is 3.21%, while abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF (ASCH.DE) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that UIMM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASCH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIMM.DE | ASCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 5.82% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 13.19% | -3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.60% | 16.09% | -3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 15.82% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 15.82% | -0.32% |
UIMM.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIMM.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ASCH.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIMM.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIMM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while ASCH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCH.DE abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIMM.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.86% | 1.02% | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.42% | 0.97% | 1.27% | 1.60% | 1.91% | 1.94% | 1.92% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIMM.DE and ASCH.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIMM.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIMM.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASCH.DE.
They also come from different issuers: UBS and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for UIMM.DE and 0.60% for ASCH.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIMM.DE and ASCH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer