PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIMI.DE vs. EL40.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIMI.DE vs. EL40.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) and Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (EL40.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UIMI.DE having a 27.62% return and EL40.DE slightly lower at 26.76%. Over the past 10 years, UIMI.DE has outperformed EL40.DE with an annualized return of 9.97%, while EL40.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.07% annualized return.


UIMI.DE

1D
-1.51%
1M
3.62%
YTD
27.62%
6M
28.59%
1Y
49.07%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
9.97%

EL40.DE

1D
-2.26%
1M
3.66%
YTD
26.76%
6M
26.78%
1Y
47.15%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
9.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIMI.DE vs. EL40.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIMI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
27.62%20.10%13.22%5.76%-14.07%4.14%6.29%22.09%-11.16%20.67%
EL40.DE
Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
26.76%17.86%13.11%4.33%-14.87%4.55%5.36%20.78%-11.51%19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between UIMI.DE and EL40.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2010

0.89

The correlation between UIMI.DE and EL40.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIMI.DE vs. EL40.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIMI.DE
UIMI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
UIMI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

EL40.DE
EL40.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EL40.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL40.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL40.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EL40.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL40.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIMI.DE vs. EL40.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) and Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (EL40.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIMI.DEEL40.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.43

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

2.88

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.64

7.00

+10.64

UIMI.DE vs. EL40.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIMI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the EL40.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIMI.DE and EL40.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIMI.DEEL40.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.79

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.35

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.44

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.30

+0.03

Drawdowns

UIMI.DE vs. EL40.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIMI.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, roughly equal to the maximum EL40.DE drawdown of -36.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMI.DE and EL40.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIMI.DEEL40.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-36.65%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-16.53%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.74%

-18.17%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.93%

-25.06%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.05%

-31.59%

-0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-3.01%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-11.60%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

6.82%

-3.99%

Volatility

UIMI.DE vs. EL40.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) is 7.28%, while Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (EL40.DE) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that UIMI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EL40.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIMI.DEEL40.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

8.00%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.92%

15.83%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.74%

26.69%

-8.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

20.75%

-4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

20.44%

-2.17%

UIMI.DE vs. EL40.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIMI.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EL40.DE's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIMI.DE vs. EL40.DE - Dividend Comparison

UIMI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while EL40.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL40.DE
Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.02%0.00%
UIMI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.69%2.31%2.10%2.63%2.91%1.68%1.82%2.17%2.03%1.67%2.54%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, UIMI.DE and EL40.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UIMI.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIMI.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for EL40.DE.

Both ETFs track MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Deka Investment GmbH. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UIMI.DE and 0.66% for EL40.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIMI.DE and EL40.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer