UIMI.DE vs. BCFE.DE
UIMI.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and BCFE.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UIMI.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, while BCFE.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIMI.DE returned 8.50%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for BCFE.DE. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UIMI.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for BCFE.DE.
Performance
UIMI.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIMI.DE achieves a 27.62% return, which is significantly higher than BCFE.DE's 17.15% return.
UIMI.DE
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 27.62%
- 6M
- 28.59%
- 1Y
- 49.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
BCFE.DE
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 17.15%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 28.89%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- —
UIMI.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIMI.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 27.62% | 20.10% | 13.22% | 5.76% | -14.07% | 4.14% | 6.29% | 22.09% | -11.16% | 8.83% |
BCFE.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 17.15% | 16.62% | 3.14% | -7.92% | 14.03% | 30.33% | -0.98% | 3.51% | -10.71% | 7.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIMI.DE and BCFE.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UIMI.DE and BCFE.DE has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIMI.DE vs. BCFE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIMI.DE
BCFE.DE
UIMI.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIMI.DE | BCFE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.40 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 4.83 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.64 | 11.89 | +5.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIMI.DE | BCFE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.14 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.55 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.49 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
UIMI.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIMI.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than BCFE.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMI.DE and BCFE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIMI.DE | BCFE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -32.93% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.26% | -6.14% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.74% | -11.00% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.93% | -27.28% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -4.36% | +1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -13.69% | +2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.50% | +0.33% |
Volatility
UIMI.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE) at 4.33%. This indicates that UIMI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCFE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIMI.DE | BCFE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 4.33% | +2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 12.10% | +2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 13.88% | +3.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 17.51% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 15.30% | +2.97% |
UIMI.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIMI.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BCFE.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIMI.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIMI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while BCFE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFE.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIMI.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.69% | 2.31% | 2.10% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 1.68% | 1.82% | 2.17% | 2.03% | 1.67% | 2.54% | 2.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIMI.DE and BCFE.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIMI.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIMI.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BCFE.DE.
UIMI.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BCFE.DE is Commodities. UIMI.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while BCFE.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UIMI.DE and 0.34% for BCFE.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIMI.DE and BCFE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer