UIMA.DE vs. DBXD.DE
UIMA.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and DBXD.DE (Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C) are both Europe Equities funds - UIMA.DE tracks the MSCI Europe while DBXD.DE tracks the DAX®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UIMA.DE returned 9.17%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for DBXD.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UIMA.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DBXD.DE.
Performance
UIMA.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIMA.DE achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than DBXD.DE's 1.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UIMA.DE having a 9.17% annualized return and DBXD.DE not far behind at 8.92%.
UIMA.DE
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 7.64%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
DBXD.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 3.40%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
UIMA.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIMA.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 7.64% | 20.65% | 8.36% | 15.54% | -9.27% | 24.93% | -3.30% | 27.60% | -11.02% | 11.02% |
DBXD.DE Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C | 1.35% | 22.65% | 18.18% | 19.60% | -12.74% | 15.26% | 3.11% | 24.69% | -18.52% | 12.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIMA.DE and DBXD.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009 | 0.87 |
The correlation between UIMA.DE and DBXD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIMA.DE vs. DBXD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIMA.DE
DBXD.DE
UIMA.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMA.DE) and Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIMA.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.04 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 0.19 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 0.58 | +5.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIMA.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.14 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.53 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.48 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.31 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
UIMA.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIMA.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.78%, smaller than the maximum DBXD.DE drawdown of -54.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMA.DE and DBXD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIMA.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.78% | -54.98% | +19.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -12.28% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.25% | -15.92% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.42% | -26.70% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.78% | -38.83% | +3.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -2.23% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -11.34% | +5.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.97% | -1.44% |
Volatility
UIMA.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMA.DE) is 4.30%, while Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that UIMA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBXD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIMA.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 5.10% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 12.95% | -2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 16.13% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 17.16% | -2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 18.35% | -2.78% |
UIMA.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIMA.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DBXD.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UIMA.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIMA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, while DBXD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXD.DE Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIMA.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 3.16% | 2.48% | 2.67% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 2.02% | 2.06% | 2.87% | 3.38% | 2.91% | 3.95% | 3.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIMA.DE and DBXD.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXD.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXD.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for UIMA.DE.
UIMA.DE tracks MSCI Europe, while DBXD.DE tracks DAX®. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for UIMA.DE and 0.09% for DBXD.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIMA.DE and DBXD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer