UIFS.L vs. VUAA.L
UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - UIFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while VUAA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIFS.L returned 10.05%/yr vs 13.95%/yr for VUAA.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UIFS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUAA.L.
Performance
UIFS.L vs. VUAA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UIFS.L is traded in GBp, while VUAA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VUAA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIFS.L achieves a -2.31% return, which is significantly lower than VUAA.L's 6.84% return.
UIFS.L
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- -2.31%
- 6M
- -2.14%
- 1Y
- 7.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
VUAA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 6.84%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 24.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.95%
- 10Y*
- —
UIFS.L vs. VUAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -2.31% | 7.07% | 32.24% | 6.12% | -0.45% | 38.07% | -6.59% | 14.18% |
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 8.97% | 9.01% | 27.46% | 20.35% | -8.96% | 30.57% | 16.79% | 11.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIFS.L and VUAA.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between UIFS.L and VUAA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UIFS.L vs. VUAA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UIFS.L
VUAA.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
UIFS.L
VUAA.L
Technology
UIFS.L
VUAA.L
Industrials
UIFS.L
VUAA.L
Basic Materials
UIFS.L
-
VUAA.L
Communication Services
UIFS.L
-
VUAA.L
Consumer Cyclical
UIFS.L
-
VUAA.L
Consumer Defensive
UIFS.L
-
VUAA.L
Energy
UIFS.L
-
VUAA.L
Healthcare
UIFS.L
-
VUAA.L
Real Estate
UIFS.L
-
VUAA.L
Utilities
UIFS.L
-
VUAA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIFS.L vs. VUAA.L — Risk / Return Rank
UIFS.L
VUAA.L
UIFS.L vs. VUAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UIFS.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 3.32 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | 10.99 | -9.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UIFS.L vs. VUAA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIFS.L drawdown since its inception was -44.49%, which is greater than VUAA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIFS.L and VUAA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIFS.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.49% | -26.15% | -18.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -7.23% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.12% | -21.12% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.12% | -21.12% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.29% | -3.72% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.19% | -3.60% | -5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.60% | 2.19% | +3.41% |
Volatility
UIFS.L vs. VUAA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) at 3.80%. This indicates that UIFS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIFS.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 3.80% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | 8.84% | +1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.10% | 12.12% | +1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 15.43% | +7.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 17.13% | +5.30% |
UIFS.L vs. VUAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIFS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UIFS.L vs. VUAA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UIFS.L nor VUAA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIFS.L and VUAA.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UIFS.L.
UIFS.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while VUAA.L is S&P 500. UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UIFS.L and 0.07% for VUAA.L.
Find the right allocation for UIFS.L and VUAA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer