UIFS.L vs. S7XP.L
UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and S7XP.L (Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - UIFS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index while S7XP.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UIFS.L returned 13.04%/yr vs 15.50%/yr for S7XP.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UIFS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for S7XP.L.
Performance
UIFS.L vs. S7XP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIFS.L achieves a -4.82% return, which is significantly lower than S7XP.L's 4.29% return. Over the past 10 years, UIFS.L has underperformed S7XP.L with an annualized return of 13.04%, while S7XP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.
UIFS.L
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
S7XP.L
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 41.95%
- 3Y*
- 44.34%
- 5Y*
- 28.16%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
UIFS.L vs. S7XP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.82% | 7.07% | 32.24% | 6.12% | -0.45% | 38.07% | -6.59% | 27.05% | -9.40% | 12.02% |
S7XP.L Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF | 4.29% | 94.76% | 25.39% | 26.22% | 6.71% | 30.03% | -18.68% | 10.65% | -30.92% | 19.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIFS.L and S7XP.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.56 |
The correlation between UIFS.L and S7XP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UIFS.L vs. S7XP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UIFS.L
S7XP.L
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
UIFS.L
S7XP.L
Technology
UIFS.L
S7XP.L
-
Industrials
UIFS.L
S7XP.L
-
Basic Materials
UIFS.L
-
S7XP.L
-
Communication Services
UIFS.L
-
S7XP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
UIFS.L
-
S7XP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
UIFS.L
-
S7XP.L
-
Energy
UIFS.L
-
S7XP.L
-
Healthcare
UIFS.L
-
S7XP.L
-
Real Estate
UIFS.L
-
S7XP.L
-
Utilities
UIFS.L
-
S7XP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIFS.L vs. S7XP.L — Risk / Return Rank
UIFS.L
S7XP.L
UIFS.L vs. S7XP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIFS.L | S7XP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.30 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 2.44 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | 8.05 | -7.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIFS.L | S7XP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.79 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 1.09 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.55 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.37 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
UIFS.L vs. S7XP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIFS.L drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, smaller than the maximum S7XP.L drawdown of -62.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIFS.L and S7XP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIFS.L | S7XP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.31% | -62.98% | +27.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -17.10% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -18.26% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | -35.01% | +16.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.31% | -62.98% | +27.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -1.85% | -4.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | -19.23% | +13.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 5.20% | +0.33% |
Volatility
UIFS.L vs. S7XP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) is 4.41%, while Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that UIFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than S7XP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIFS.L | S7XP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 6.49% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | 18.61% | -8.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 23.31% | -9.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 25.83% | -8.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 27.92% | -7.80% |
UIFS.L vs. S7XP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIFS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than S7XP.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIFS.L vs. S7XP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UIFS.L nor S7XP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UIFS.L and S7XP.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for S7XP.L.
UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while S7XP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UIFS.L and 0.30% for S7XP.L.
Find the right allocation for UIFS.L and S7XP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer