UIFS.L vs. IITU.L
UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - UIFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UIFS.L returned 13.04%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
UIFS.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIFS.L achieves a -4.82% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, UIFS.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 13.04%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
UIFS.L
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
UIFS.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.82% | 7.07% | 32.24% | 6.12% | -0.45% | 38.07% | -6.59% | 27.05% | -9.40% | 12.02% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIFS.L and IITU.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UIFS.L and IITU.L has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
UIFS.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UIFS.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
UIFS.L
IITU.L
-
Technology
UIFS.L
IITU.L
Industrials
UIFS.L
IITU.L
Basic Materials
UIFS.L
-
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
UIFS.L
-
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
UIFS.L
-
IITU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
UIFS.L
-
IITU.L
-
Energy
UIFS.L
-
IITU.L
Healthcare
UIFS.L
-
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
UIFS.L
-
IITU.L
-
Utilities
UIFS.L
-
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIFS.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
UIFS.L
IITU.L
UIFS.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIFS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.44 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 3.17 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | 8.17 | -7.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIFS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 2.71 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 1.16 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 1.28 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.23 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
UIFS.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIFS.L drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIFS.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIFS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.31% | -28.03% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -16.76% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -28.03% | +9.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | -28.03% | +9.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.31% | -28.03% | -7.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -2.89% | -3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | -5.14% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 6.51% | -0.98% |
Volatility
UIFS.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) is 4.41%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that UIFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIFS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 7.01% | -2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | 14.45% | -3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 19.60% | -5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 21.94% | -4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 21.31% | -1.19% |
UIFS.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UIFS.L and IITU.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UIFS.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UIFS.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UIFS.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIFS.L and IITU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
UIFS.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index.
Find the right allocation for UIFS.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer