UIC2.DE vs. KROP.DE
UIC2.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and KROP.DE (Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds - UIC2.DE tracks the Solactive China Technology while KROP.DE tracks the Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UIC2.DE returned 8.94%/yr vs -2.05%/yr for KROP.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UIC2.DE charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.DE.
Performance
UIC2.DE vs. KROP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIC2.DE achieves a -6.51% return, which is significantly lower than KROP.DE's 17.14% return.
UIC2.DE
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- -6.51%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- 0.73%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -8.06%
- 10Y*
- —
KROP.DE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- -2.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UIC2.DE vs. KROP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIC2.DE UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | -6.51% | 25.73% | 19.00% | -13.83% | -23.45% |
KROP.DE Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 17.14% | -4.87% | -2.79% | -25.11% | -19.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIC2.DE and KROP.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.34 |
The correlation between UIC2.DE and KROP.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIC2.DE vs. KROP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIC2.DE
KROP.DE
UIC2.DE vs. KROP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIC2.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.12 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 1.04 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.04 | 2.21 | -2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIC2.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 0.62 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | -0.47 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
UIC2.DE vs. KROP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIC2.DE drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, which is greater than KROP.DE's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIC2.DE and KROP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIC2.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -52.74% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.64% | -9.22% | -21.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.66% | -27.28% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.60% | -41.08% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.07% | -36.46% | -5.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.47% | 4.34% | +14.13% |
Volatility
UIC2.DE vs. KROP.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE) at 5.58%. This indicates that UIC2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIC2.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.04% | 5.58% | +4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.36% | 12.02% | +5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.06% | 15.43% | +17.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.72% | 19.64% | +18.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.40% | 19.64% | +17.76% |
UIC2.DE vs. KROP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIC2.DE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIC2.DE vs. KROP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither UIC2.DE nor KROP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UIC2.DE and KROP.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIC2.DE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIC2.DE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.DE.
UIC2.DE tracks Solactive China Technology, while KROP.DE tracks Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for UIC2.DE and 0.50% for KROP.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIC2.DE and KROP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer