UHPIX vs. FNPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX).
UHPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Feb 3, 2008. FNPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000.
Performance
UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 30.33% | -49.82% | -29.87% | -26.13% | -63.62% | 94.89% | -64.76% | -43.34% | 39.47% | -57.67% |
FNPIX ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund | -17.62% | 16.39% | 38.51% | 18.34% | -23.84% | 57.11% | -9.83% | 46.49% | -17.23% | 27.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UHPIX achieves a 30.33% return, which is significantly higher than FNPIX's -17.62% return. Over the past 10 years, UHPIX has underperformed FNPIX with an annualized return of -30.64%, while FNPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.
UHPIX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 20.61%
- YTD
- 30.33%
- 6M
- 70.89%
- 1Y
- 6.73%
- 3Y*
- -23.76%
- 5Y*
- -24.26%
- 10Y*
- -30.64%
FNPIX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- -17.62%
- 6M
- -16.27%
- 1Y
- -7.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UHPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FNPIX's 1.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UHPIX vs. FNPIX — Risk / Return Rank
UHPIX
FNPIX
UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UHPIX | FNPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | -0.21 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | -0.10 | +0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.99 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | -0.39 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | -1.18 | +1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UHPIX | FNPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | -0.21 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.36 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | 0.43 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.09 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between UHPIX and FNPIX is -0.51. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Dividend Comparison
UHPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, while FNPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 3.29% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% |
FNPIX ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 13.10% | 0.00% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UHPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than FNPIX's maximum drawdown of -93.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHPIX and FNPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UHPIX | FNPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -93.14% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.89% | -22.37% | -38.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.64% | -37.80% | -58.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.81% | -58.23% | -40.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -21.12% | -78.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.36% | -36.37% | -56.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.61% | 7.50% | +35.11% |
Volatility
UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) has a higher volatility of 15.76% compared to ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) at 6.14%. This indicates that UHPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UHPIX | FNPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.76% | 6.14% | +9.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.13% | 16.85% | +20.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.18% | 28.86% | +29.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.91% | 27.38% | +55.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 320.74% | 30.68% | +290.06% |