UHPIX vs. FNPIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UHPIX (ProFunds UltraShort China) and FNPIX (ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund) are both mutual funds - UHPIX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while FNPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, UHPIX returned -31.72%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for FNPIX. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. UHPIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 1.72%/yr for FNPIX.

Performance

UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHPIX achieves a 18.01% return, which is significantly higher than FNPIX's -10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, UHPIX has underperformed FNPIX with an annualized return of -31.72%, while FNPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.

UHPIX

• 1D: -4.60%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 18.01%
• 6M: 23.79%
• 1Y: -11.88%
• 3Y*: -31.74%
• 5Y*: -26.86%
• 10Y*: -31.72%

FNPIX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: -10.35%
• 6M: -7.10%
• 1Y: -1.81%
• 3Y*: 20.57%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: 13.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China	18.01%	-49.82%	-29.87%	-26.13%	-63.62%	94.89%	-64.76%	-43.34%	39.47%	-57.67%
FNPIX ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund	-10.35%	16.39%	38.51%	18.34%	-23.84%	57.11%	-9.83%	46.49%	-17.23%	27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between UHPIX and FNPIX is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2008	-0.50

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between UHPIX and FNPIX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.50 to -0.22, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Return for Risk

UHPIX vs. FNPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHPIX

UHPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
UHPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
UHPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
UHPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
UHPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
UHPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FNPIX

FNPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
FNPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FNPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FNPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FNPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FNPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UHPIX	FNPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	-0.07	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	0.04	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.01	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	-0.07	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	-0.18	-0.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHPIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the FNPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHPIX and FNPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UHPIX	FNPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	-0.07	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	0.30	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.14	0.44	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	0.10	-0.27

Drawdowns

UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than FNPIX's maximum drawdown of -93.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHPIX and FNPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UHPIX	FNPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	-93.14%	-6.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.98%	-22.37%	-24.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-80.96%	-23.21%	-57.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.64%	-37.80%	-58.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.81%	-58.23%	-40.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.96%	-14.16%	-85.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-93.42%	-36.22%	-57.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.52%	8.95%	+17.57%

Volatility

UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) has a higher volatility of 19.09% compared to ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) at 4.59%. This indicates that UHPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UHPIX	FNPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.09%	4.59%	+14.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.51%	16.23%	+21.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.53%	21.37%	+31.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.92%	27.36%	+55.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	228.53%	30.65%	+197.88%

UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UHPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FNPIX's 1.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

UHPIX vs. FNPIX - Dividend Comparison

UHPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, while FNPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FNPIX ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.49%	0.25%	0.00%	13.10%	0.00%	1.70%
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China	3.64%	4.29%	0.00%	3.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UHPIX and FNPIX in my portfolio?

UHPIX and FNPIX have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UHPIX or FNPIX?

UHPIX has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to FNPIX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHPIX dropped -99.98% vs FNPIX's -93.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.