PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UHPIX vs. ENPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHPIX achieves a 18.01% return, which is significantly lower than ENPIX's 44.87% return. Over the past 10 years, UHPIX has underperformed ENPIX with an annualized return of -31.72%, while ENPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.16% annualized return.


UHPIX

1D
-4.60%
1M
3.32%
YTD
18.01%
6M
23.79%
1Y
-11.88%
3Y*
-31.74%
5Y*
-26.86%
10Y*
-31.72%

ENPIX

1D
1.64%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
44.87%
6M
40.54%
1Y
61.49%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
23.64%
10Y*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UHPIX
ProFunds UltraShort China
18.01%-49.82%-29.87%-26.13%-63.62%94.89%-64.76%-43.34%39.47%-57.67%
ENPIX
ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund
44.87%4.99%2.30%-7.46%92.17%82.32%-53.71%10.35%-30.54%-5.59%

Correlation

The correlation between UHPIX and ENPIX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2008

-0.44

The correlation between UHPIX and ENPIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.44 (all time) to 0.04 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UHPIX vs. ENPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHPIX
UHPIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UHPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
UHPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ENPIX
ENPIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ENPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ENPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UHPIXENPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.32

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

3.59

-3.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.51

10.06

-10.57

UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHPIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the ENPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHPIX and ENPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UHPIXENPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

2.10

-2.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.61

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

0.16

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

0.12

-0.30

Drawdowns

UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than ENPIX's maximum drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHPIX and ENPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UHPIXENPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-90.12%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.98%

-17.99%

-28.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.96%

-32.27%

-48.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.64%

-36.48%

-60.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.81%

-84.54%

-14.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-12.11%

-87.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.42%

-36.91%

-56.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.52%

6.41%

+20.11%

Volatility

UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) has a higher volatility of 19.09% compared to ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) at 12.17%. This indicates that UHPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UHPIXENPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.09%

12.17%

+6.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.51%

24.79%

+12.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.53%

30.75%

+21.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.92%

38.78%

+44.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

228.53%

44.71%

+183.82%

UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UHPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than ENPIX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Dividend Comparison

UHPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than ENPIX's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENPIX
ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund
1.91%2.76%3.19%0.87%2.76%1.59%1.76%1.34%1.76%0.84%0.57%0.56%
UHPIX
ProFunds UltraShort China
3.64%4.29%0.00%3.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UHPIX and ENPIX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UHPIX has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to ENPIX (12.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHPIX dropped -99.98% vs ENPIX's -90.12%.

ENPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UHPIX and ENPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer