UHPIX vs. ENPIX
UHPIX (ProFunds UltraShort China) and ENPIX (ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund) are both mutual funds - UHPIX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while ENPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, UHPIX returned -31.72%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for ENPIX. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. UHPIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for ENPIX.
Performance
UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UHPIX achieves a 18.01% return, which is significantly lower than ENPIX's 44.87% return. Over the past 10 years, UHPIX has underperformed ENPIX with an annualized return of -31.72%, while ENPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.16% annualized return.
UHPIX
- 1D
- -4.60%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 18.01%
- 6M
- 23.79%
- 1Y
- -11.88%
- 3Y*
- -31.74%
- 5Y*
- -26.86%
- 10Y*
- -31.72%
ENPIX
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- YTD
- 44.87%
- 6M
- 40.54%
- 1Y
- 61.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- 23.64%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 18.01% | -49.82% | -29.87% | -26.13% | -63.62% | 94.89% | -64.76% | -43.34% | 39.47% | -57.67% |
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 44.87% | 4.99% | 2.30% | -7.46% | 92.17% | 82.32% | -53.71% | 10.35% | -30.54% | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between UHPIX and ENPIX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2008 | -0.44 |
The correlation between UHPIX and ENPIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.44 (all time) to 0.04 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UHPIX vs. ENPIX — Risk / Return Rank
UHPIX
ENPIX
UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UHPIX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.32 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 3.59 | -3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | 10.06 | -10.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UHPIX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 2.10 | -2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | 0.61 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | 0.16 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | 0.12 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UHPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than ENPIX's maximum drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHPIX and ENPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UHPIX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -90.12% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.98% | -17.99% | -28.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.96% | -32.27% | -48.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.64% | -36.48% | -60.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.81% | -84.54% | -14.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -12.11% | -87.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.42% | -36.91% | -56.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.52% | 6.41% | +20.11% |
Volatility
UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) has a higher volatility of 19.09% compared to ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) at 12.17%. This indicates that UHPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UHPIX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.09% | 12.17% | +6.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.51% | 24.79% | +12.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.53% | 30.75% | +21.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.92% | 38.78% | +44.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 228.53% | 44.71% | +183.82% |
UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UHPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than ENPIX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
UHPIX vs. ENPIX - Dividend Comparison
UHPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than ENPIX's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 1.91% | 2.76% | 3.19% | 0.87% | 2.76% | 1.59% | 1.76% | 1.34% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.57% | 0.56% |
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 3.64% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UHPIX and ENPIX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UHPIX has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to ENPIX (12.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHPIX dropped -99.98% vs ENPIX's -90.12%.
ENPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UHPIX and ENPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer