PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UGL vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UGL vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGL achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, UGL has outperformed YCS with an annualized return of 18.45%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.


UGL

1D
-2.00%
1M
-3.96%
YTD
-2.16%
6M
1.78%
1Y
51.67%
3Y*
53.18%
5Y*
27.00%
10Y*
18.45%

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UGL vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
-2.16%137.57%46.36%15.56%-7.59%-12.30%39.04%31.11%-8.02%22.50%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between UGL and YCS is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2008

-0.37

The correlation between UGL and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.44 (10 years) to -0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UGL vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UGL
UGL Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
UGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
UGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGL Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UGL vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UGLYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.35

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

3.97

-2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.17

12.40

-9.23

UGL vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGL and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UGLYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.92

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

1.12

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.65

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.33

+0.06

Drawdowns

UGL vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGL drawdown since its inception was -75.93%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGL and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UGLYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.93%

-49.56%

-26.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.56%

-8.30%

-29.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.56%

-23.05%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.23%

-27.32%

-12.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.23%

-27.32%

-18.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.56%

0.00%

-36.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.63%

-19.93%

-23.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.35%

2.66%

+13.69%

Volatility

UGL vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that UGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UGLYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.03%

2.75%

+8.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.81%

12.32%

+34.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.91%

17.27%

+35.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.18%

21.10%

+15.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.34%

19.01%

+13.33%

UGL vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

UGL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

UGL vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither UGL nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UGL and YCS have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGL has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGL dropped -75.93% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, UGL leads with 18.45% vs 12.34% for YCS. On fees, UGL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UGL has performed better with a 18.45% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

UGL and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

UGL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. UGL tracks Bloomberg Gold Subindex (200%), while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UGL and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UGL and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer