UGL vs. SCO
UGL (ProShares Ultra Gold) and SCO (ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - UGL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold Subindex (200%), while SCO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UGL returned 15.23%/yr vs -37.10%/yr for SCO. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UGL vs. SCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGL achieves a -16.89% return, which is significantly higher than SCO's -57.74% return. Over the past 10 years, UGL has outperformed SCO with an annualized return of 15.23%, while SCO has yielded a comparatively lower -37.10% annualized return.
UGL
- 1D
- -3.69%
- 1M
- -17.68%
- YTD
- -16.89%
- 6M
- -24.16%
- 1Y
- 27.53%
- 3Y*
- 46.82%
- 5Y*
- 26.27%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
SCO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 30.31%
- YTD
- -57.74%
- 6M
- -56.56%
- 1Y
- -50.02%
- 3Y*
- -32.22%
- 5Y*
- -38.03%
- 10Y*
- -37.10%
UGL vs. SCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGL ProShares Ultra Gold | -16.89% | 137.57% | 46.36% | 15.56% | -7.59% | -12.30% | 39.04% | 31.11% | -8.02% | 22.50% |
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | -57.74% | 15.90% | -19.00% | -12.41% | -62.59% | -72.62% | -4.20% | -58.50% | 19.22% | -22.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGL and SCO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2008 | -0.15 |
The correlation between UGL and SCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to 0.06 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGL vs. SCO — Risk / Return Rank
UGL
SCO
UGL vs. SCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UGL | SCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.86 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | -0.69 | +1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.46 | -1.35 | +2.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UGL vs. SCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGL drawdown since its inception was -75.93%, smaller than the maximum SCO drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGL and SCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGL | SCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.93% | -99.80% | +23.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.64% | -72.24% | +25.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.64% | -78.76% | +32.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.64% | -94.80% | +48.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.64% | -99.51% | +52.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.11% | -99.72% | +53.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.62% | -85.20% | +41.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.88% | 37.01% | -18.13% |
Volatility
UGL vs. SCO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) have volatilities of 16.29% and 15.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGL | SCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.29% | 15.93% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.19% | 47.12% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.81% | 57.11% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.65% | 60.04% | -23.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.51% | 71.88% | -39.37% |
UGL vs. SCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UGL and SCO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UGL vs. SCO - Dividend Comparison
Neither UGL nor SCO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UGL and SCO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGL has higher volatility (16.29%) compared to SCO (15.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGL dropped -75.93% vs SCO's -99.80%.
On 10-year performance, UGL leads with 15.23% vs -37.10% for SCO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SCO has been the lower-risk option at 15.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGL has performed better with a 15.23% return vs -37.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UGL and SCO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UGL and SCO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
UGL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while SCO is Oil & Gas. UGL tracks Bloomberg Gold Subindex (200%), while SCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%).
UGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UGL and SCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer