UFO vs. QTUM
UFO (Procure Space ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UFO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S-Network Space Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UFO returned 14.39%/yr vs 27.81%/yr for QTUM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UFO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
UFO vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFO achieves a 41.91% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 44.14% return.
UFO
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 41.91%
- 6M
- 52.56%
- 1Y
- 114.48%
- 3Y*
- 44.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.39%
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- 44.14%
- 6M
- 39.20%
- 1Y
- 80.80%
- 3Y*
- 48.48%
- 5Y*
- 27.81%
- 10Y*
- —
UFO vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFO Procure Space ETF | 41.91% | 67.36% | 27.22% | -2.34% | -25.85% | 7.17% | -2.15% | 5.66% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 44.14% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 19.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFO and QTUM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between UFO and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
UFO vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UFO
QTUM
Industrials
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
UFO
QTUM
Communication Services
UFO
QTUM
Technology
UFO
QTUM
Basic Materials
UFO
-
QTUM
-
Consumer Cyclical
UFO
-
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
UFO
-
QTUM
-
Energy
UFO
-
QTUM
-
Financial Services
UFO
-
QTUM
-
Healthcare
UFO
-
QTUM
Real Estate
UFO
-
QTUM
-
Utilities
UFO
-
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFO vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
UFO
QTUM
UFO vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Space ETF (UFO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UFO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.24 | 5.32 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.46 | 19.76 | -3.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UFO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | 2.94 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 1.04 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.03 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
UFO vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFO drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFO and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.33% | -38.45% | -11.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.95% | -15.26% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.91% | -25.39% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.33% | -38.45% | -11.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.11% | -6.53% | -12.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.81% | -8.25% | -13.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 4.10% | +2.88% |
Volatility
UFO vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a higher volatility of 18.21% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 13.41%. This indicates that UFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.21% | 13.41% | +4.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.15% | 22.31% | +9.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.01% | 27.73% | +11.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.14% | 26.85% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.89% | 27.34% | +3.55% |
UFO vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UFO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
UFO vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than QTUM's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.74% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.30% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UFO and QTUM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFO has higher volatility (18.21%) compared to QTUM (13.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFO dropped -50.33% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 27.81% vs 14.39% for UFO. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 13.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 27.81% return vs 14.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.30% for UFO.
UFO is categorized as Global Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. UFO tracks S-Network Space Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: ProcureAM and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UFO and 0.40% for QTUM.
UFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UFO and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer