PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UFIV vs. TFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UFIV vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFIV achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than TFLO's 1.59% return.


UFIV

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
-0.41%
1Y
2.59%
3Y*
3.14%
5Y*
10Y*

TFLO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
2.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFIV vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UFIV
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF
-0.49%6.89%1.09%1.58%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.59%4.22%5.34%4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between UFIV and TFLO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2023

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UFIV vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFIV
UFIV Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
UFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
UFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFIV vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UFIVTFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-49.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

13.94

-12.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

201.22

-200.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.85

823.26

-820.41

UFIV vs. TFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 14.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFIV and TFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UFIVTFLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

14.09

-13.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

10.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

5.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.99

-0.34

Drawdowns

UFIV vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFIV drawdown since its inception was -5.63%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFIV and TFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UFIVTFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-5.01%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-0.02%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.03%

-0.04%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

0.00%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-0.10%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.00%

+0.91%

Volatility

UFIV vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison

F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.07%. This indicates that UFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UFIVTFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.07%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

0.20%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

0.28%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.37%

0.35%

+4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.37%

0.46%

+3.91%

UFIV vs. TFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UFIV and TFLO have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UFIV vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison

UFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than TFLO's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
3.90%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%
UFIV
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF
3.57%3.66%4.00%2.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UFIV and TFLO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UFIV has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to TFLO (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFIV dropped -5.63% vs TFLO's -5.01%.

On 3-year performance, TFLO leads with 4.74% vs 3.14% for UFIV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, TFLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TFLO has performed better with a 4.74% return vs 3.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UFIV and TFLO have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

TFLO has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.57% for UFIV.

UFIV tracks ICE BofA Current 5-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TFLO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and iShares.

TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.09 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UFIV and TFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer