UETE.DE vs. XMME.DE
UETE.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - UETE.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while XMME.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UETE.DE returned 10.19%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UETE.DE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
UETE.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UETE.DE achieves a 34.13% return, which is significantly higher than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
UETE.DE
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 6.56%
- YTD
- 34.13%
- 6M
- 35.13%
- 1Y
- 59.19%
- 3Y*
- 24.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- —
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 50.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
UETE.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UETE.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 34.13% | 21.00% | 16.13% | 2.60% | -15.05% | 7.18% | 5.63% | 7.21% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between UETE.DE and XMME.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between UETE.DE and XMME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UETE.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UETE.DE
XMME.DE
UETE.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UETE.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.55 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 4.98 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | 18.04 | -8.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UETE.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 3.00 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.51 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.45 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
UETE.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UETE.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UETE.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UETE.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.83% | -31.96% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.70% | -10.67% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.20% | -19.16% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.75% | -24.38% | +0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -1.04% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.85% | -9.53% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.60% | 2.95% | +3.65% |
Volatility
UETE.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETE.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) at 7.48%. This indicates that UETE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UETE.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 7.48% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.80% | 14.90% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.86% | 17.70% | +10.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 16.74% | +3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 18.61% | +3.27% |
UETE.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UETE.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UETE.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither UETE.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, UETE.DE and XMME.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for UETE.DE.
UETE.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for UETE.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for UETE.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer