UETE.DE vs. EMXC.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UETE.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and EMXC.DE (Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - UETE.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while EMXC.DE tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UETE.DE returned 10.19%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for EMXC.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UETE.DE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMXC.DE.

Performance

UETE.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETE.DE) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UETE.DE achieves a 34.13% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC.DE's 40.23% return.

UETE.DE

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: 6.56%
• YTD: 34.13%
• 6M: 35.13%
• 1Y: 59.19%
• 3Y*: 24.18%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: —

EMXC.DE

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: 5.62%
• YTD: 40.23%
• 6M: 42.71%
• 1Y: 66.91%
• 3Y*: 25.05%
• 5Y*: 13.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UETE.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
UETE.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc	34.13%	21.00%	16.13%	2.60%	-15.05%	7.18%	5.63%	3.82%
EMXC.DE Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc	40.23%	19.92%	9.13%	14.33%	-13.60%	17.56%	2.27%	6.14%

Correlation

The correlation between UETE.DE and EMXC.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2019	0.82

The correlation between UETE.DE and EMXC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (5 years) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UETE.DE vs. EMXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UETE.DE

UETE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 69
UETE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
UETE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
UETE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 85
UETE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
UETE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 53

EMXC.DE

EMXC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 92
EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EMXC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
EMXC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EMXC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
EMXC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UETE.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETE.DE) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UETE.DE	EMXC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	3.46	-1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	4.43	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.62	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	5.78	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.11	21.97	-12.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UETE.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UETE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is lower than the EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UETE.DE and EMXC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UETE.DE	EMXC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	3.46	-1.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.85	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.69	-0.22

Drawdowns

UETE.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UETE.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, smaller than the maximum EMXC.DE drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UETE.DE and EMXC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	UETE.DE	EMXC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.83%	-38.77%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.70%	-11.87%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.20%	-20.48%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.75%	-20.48%	-3.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.50%	-2.53%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.85%	-6.73%	-4.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.60%	3.13%	+3.47%

Volatility

UETE.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETE.DE) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) have volatilities of 8.58% and 8.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UETE.DE	EMXC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	8.44%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.80%	17.23%	-1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.86%	19.85%	+8.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	15.83%	+4.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.88%	18.50%	+3.38%

UETE.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UETE.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UETE.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UETE.DE nor EMXC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UETE.DE and EMXC.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, UETE.DE and EMXC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, UETE.DE or EMXC.DE?

On fees, EMXC.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UETE.DE or EMXC.DE?

EMXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for UETE.DE.

What is the main difference between UETE.DE and EMXC.DE?

UETE.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for UETE.DE and 0.15% for EMXC.DE.