UET5.DE vs. CHSJ.DE
UET5.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist) and CHSJ.DE (UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UET5.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX® 50 ESG, while CHSJ.DE is a CLO fund tracking the J.P. Morgan European Collateralised Loan Obligation Index AAA sub-set (€-CLOIE AAA). Both are passively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UET5.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CHSJ.DE.
Performance
UET5.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UET5.DE achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than CHSJ.DE's 1.46% return.
UET5.DE
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- 18.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.80%
- 10Y*
- —
CHSJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UET5.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UET5.DE UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist | 8.56% | 10.29% |
CHSJ.DE UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 1.46% | 1.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between UET5.DE and CHSJ.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UET5.DE vs. CHSJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UET5.DE
CHSJ.DE
UET5.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist (UET5.DE) and UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc (CHSJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UET5.DE | CHSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UET5.DE | CHSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 2.78 | -2.04 |
Drawdowns
UET5.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UET5.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than CHSJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -0.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UET5.DE and CHSJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UET5.DE | CHSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -0.38% | -36.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.08% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -0.06% | -4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | — | — |
Volatility
UET5.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UET5.DE | CHSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.97% | 1.30% | +15.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 1.30% | +15.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 1.30% | +18.39% |
UET5.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UET5.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CHSJ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UET5.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
UET5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, while CHSJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHSJ.DE UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UET5.DE UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist | 2.92% | 2.15% | 3.28% | 2.96% | 3.06% | 1.90% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UET5.DE and CHSJ.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UET5.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UET5.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CHSJ.DE.
UET5.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while CHSJ.DE is CLO. UET5.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50 ESG, while CHSJ.DE tracks J.P. Morgan European Collateralised Loan Obligation Index AAA sub-set (€-CLOIE AAA). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for UET5.DE and 0.25% for CHSJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for UET5.DE and CHSJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer