PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CHSJ.DE vs. CLOD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

CHSJ.DE vs. CLOD.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc (CHSJ.DE) and Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE).

CHSJ.DE and CLOD.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHSJ.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan European Collateralised Loan Obligation Index AAA sub-set (€-CLOIE AAA). It was launched on Jul 1, 2025. CLOD.DE is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Feb 10, 2025.

Performance

CHSJ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc (CHSJ.DE) and Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CHSJ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
CHSJ.DE
UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc		0.36%1.78%
CLOD.DE
Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist		0.61%0.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHSJ.DE achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than CLOD.DE's 0.61% return.

CHSJ.DE

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.36%
6M
1.18%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

CLOD.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.52%
1Y
2.35%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc

Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist

Often compared with CHSJ.DE:
CHSJ.DE vs. CLOA.DECHSJ.DE vs. 4UBF.DECHSJ.DE vs. AW1C.DECHSJ.DE vs. UCLA.DECHSJ.DE vs. UIQ4.DECHSJ.DE vs. EAAA.DECHSJ.DE vs. SPPC.DE
Often compared with CLOD.DE:
CLOD.DE vs. SPPC.DECLOD.DE vs. EAAA.DECLOD.DE vs. EUCL.DECLOD.DE vs. JCL0.DECLOD.DE vs. CLOA.DECLOD.DE vs. JAAE.DECLOD.DE vs. LAAA.DE

CHSJ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CHSJ.DE and CLOD.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

CHSJ.DE
UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc
CLOD.DE
Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

CHSJ.DE vs. CLOD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CHSJ.DE
CLOD.DE
CLOD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CLOD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHSJ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc (CHSJ.DE) and Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CHSJ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CHSJ.DECLOD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

1.76

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

1.59

+0.65

Correlation

The correlation between CHSJ.DE and CLOD.DE is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CHSJ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Dividend Comparison

CHSJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLOD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%.

TTM2025
CHSJ.DE
UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc		0.00%0.00%
CLOD.DE
Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist		2.56%1.79%

Drawdowns

CHSJ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHSJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -0.38%, smaller than the maximum CLOD.DE drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHSJ.DE and CLOD.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CHSJ.DECLOD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-0.76%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-0.76%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.10%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.07%

-0.16%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

0.21%

—

Volatility

CHSJ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CHSJ.DECLOD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

0.38%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

0.98%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31%

1.33%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.31%

1.30%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.31%

1.30%

+0.01%