UET5.DE vs. CEMT.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UET5.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist) and CEMT.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - UET5.DE tracks the EURO STOXX® 50 ESG while CEMT.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UET5.DE returned 13.80%/yr vs 4.08%/yr for CEMT.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UET5.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CEMT.DE.

Performance

UET5.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist (UET5.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UET5.DE

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 6M: 10.09%
• 1Y: 18.93%
• 3Y*: 18.86%
• 5Y*: 13.80%
• 10Y*: —

CEMT.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 3.97%
• 3Y*: 9.41%
• 5Y*: 4.08%
• 10Y*: 6.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UET5.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
UET5.DE UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist	8.56%	25.92%	12.78%	25.36%	-9.35%	26.94%	0.18%	15.08%
CEMT.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF	0.00%	17.53%	5.08%	14.19%	-18.24%	19.63%	1.61%	16.39%

Correlation

The correlation between UET5.DE and CEMT.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2019	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between UET5.DE and CEMT.DE has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

UET5.DE vs. CEMT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UET5.DE

UET5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
UET5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
UET5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
UET5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 32
UET5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
UET5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 37

CEMT.DE

CEMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 26
CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
CEMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
CEMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 32
CEMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CEMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UET5.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist (UET5.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UET5.DE	CEMT.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	0.77	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.07	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.21	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	1.10	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.64	4.03	+1.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UET5.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UET5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UET5.DE and CEMT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UET5.DE	CEMT.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	0.77	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.28	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.37	+0.37

Drawdowns

UET5.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UET5.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, roughly equal to the maximum CEMT.DE drawdown of -37.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UET5.DE and CEMT.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	UET5.DE	CEMT.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.03%	-37.66%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	-4.26%	-7.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.56%	-14.36%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.13%	-29.23%	+6.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-0.39%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-7.08%	+2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	1.16%	+2.23%

Volatility

UET5.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist (UET5.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) at 0.00%. This indicates that UET5.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UET5.DE	CEMT.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.06%	0.00%	+5.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.82%	0.00%	+13.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.97%	6.11%	+10.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.27%	14.61%	+2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.69%	16.11%	+3.58%

UET5.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UET5.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UET5.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Dividend Comparison

UET5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, while CEMT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CEMT.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UET5.DE UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist	2.92%	2.15%	3.28%	2.96%	3.06%	1.90%	1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UET5.DE and CEMT.DE in my portfolio?

UET5.DE and CEMT.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UET5.DE or CEMT.DE?

On fees, UET5.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UET5.DE or CEMT.DE?

UET5.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMT.DE.

What is the main difference between UET5.DE and CEMT.DE?

UET5.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50 ESG, while CEMT.DE tracks MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for UET5.DE and 0.25% for CEMT.DE.