PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEIPX vs. VMVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEIPX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Engage For Impact Fund (UEIPX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UEIPX having a 8.16% return and VMVFX slightly lower at 7.86%.


UEIPX

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.62%
YTD
8.16%
6M
7.68%
1Y
19.44%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*

VMVFX

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
7.86%
6M
7.73%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
12.78%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEIPX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UEIPX
UBS Engage For Impact Fund
8.16%20.69%10.39%16.46%-22.35%16.12%16.94%23.66%-5.23%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
7.86%12.74%13.38%7.82%-4.48%23.74%-3.99%23.28%-1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between UEIPX and VMVFX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2018

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between UEIPX and VMVFX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEIPX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEIPX
UEIPX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
UEIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
UEIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVFX
VMVFX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VMVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEIPX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Engage For Impact Fund (UEIPX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UEIPXVMVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.11

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.81

8.18

-0.37

UEIPX vs. VMVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEIPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the VMVFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEIPX and VMVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UEIPX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEIPX drawdown since its inception was -35.23%, which is greater than VMVFX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEIPX and VMVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEIPXVMVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.23%

-33.09%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-6.27%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-7.96%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-13.02%

-22.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.39%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-2.82%

-7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.61%

+0.95%

Volatility

UEIPX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison

UBS Engage For Impact Fund (UEIPX) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 2.34%. This indicates that UEIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEIPXVMVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.34%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

5.41%

+4.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.43%

7.02%

+6.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

10.77%

+7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.40%

12.48%

+6.92%

UEIPX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEIPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

UEIPX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison

UEIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.61%, more than VMVFX's 9.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UEIPX
UBS Engage For Impact Fund
12.61%13.64%4.91%0.66%0.95%11.99%0.76%2.68%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
9.25%9.98%3.77%3.05%4.96%12.73%2.02%5.12%7.27%2.30%2.71%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEIPX and VMVFX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEIPX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to VMVFX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEIPX dropped -35.23% vs VMVFX's -33.09%.

VMVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEIPX and VMVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer