UEFS.DE vs. EM1C.DE
UEFS.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist) and EM1C.DE (VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - UEFS.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped while EM1C.DE tracks the JP Morgan GBI-Emerging Markets Global Core. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UEFS.DE returned 3.30%/yr vs 2.23%/yr for EM1C.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UEFS.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EM1C.DE.
Performance
UEFS.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UEFS.DE achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly higher than EM1C.DE's 2.30% return.
UEFS.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- 11.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.55%
EM1C.DE
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 7.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- —
UEFS.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEFS.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | 3.71% | 2.37% | 13.84% | 8.28% | -14.67% | 5.66% | -4.70% | 17.07% | 0.35% | -4.58% |
EM1C.DE VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF | 2.30% | 4.53% | 3.69% | 6.44% | -4.38% | -2.30% | -6.16% | 12.05% | -4.25% | -3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between UEFS.DE and EM1C.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2017 | 0.57 |
The correlation between UEFS.DE and EM1C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UEFS.DE vs. EM1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UEFS.DE
EM1C.DE
UEFS.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE) and VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UEFS.DE | EM1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.26 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 2.04 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 6.75 | +5.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UEFS.DE | EM1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.39 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.31 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.09 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
UEFS.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UEFS.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.26%, which is greater than EM1C.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEFS.DE and EM1C.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UEFS.DE | EM1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.26% | -18.83% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -3.42% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.70% | -7.20% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | -8.53% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.85% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -8.00% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 1.04% | -0.13% |
Volatility
UEFS.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE) is 1.27%, while VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that UEFS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EM1C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UEFS.DE | EM1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 1.55% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.77% | 4.15% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.76% | 5.03% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.69% | 7.03% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.37% | 8.06% | +1.31% |
UEFS.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UEFS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EM1C.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
UEFS.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Dividend Comparison
UEFS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, while EM1C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EM1C.DE VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UEFS.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | 6.50% | 7.96% | 6.14% | 6.46% | 6.08% | 4.22% | 5.09% | 4.60% | 4.53% | 4.90% | 2.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UEFS.DE and EM1C.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UEFS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UEFS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EM1C.DE.
UEFS.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped, while EM1C.DE tracks JP Morgan GBI-Emerging Markets Global Core. They also come from different issuers: UBS and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UEFS.DE and 0.30% for EM1C.DE.
Find the right allocation for UEFS.DE and EM1C.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer