PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEFI.DE vs. SNA2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEFI.DE vs. SNA2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SNA2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEFI.DE achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than SNA2.DE's 0.82% return.


UEFI.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.27%
1Y
1.25%
3Y*
-0.59%
5Y*
-0.43%
10Y*
0.15%

SNA2.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.93%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.09%
1Y
1.39%
3Y*
-0.30%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEFI.DE vs. SNA2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UEFI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.01%-5.01%4.87%-0.30%-9.82%4.88%-0.27%-4.31%
SNA2.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.82%-5.92%6.08%0.13%-6.90%5.64%-2.06%-3.72%

Correlation

The correlation between UEFI.DE and SNA2.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2019

0.92

The correlation between UEFI.DE and SNA2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEFI.DE vs. SNA2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEFI.DE
UEFI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
UEFI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SNA2.DE
SNA2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SNA2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNA2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNA2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SNA2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNA2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEFI.DE vs. SNA2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SNA2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UEFI.DESNA2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.04

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

0.27

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

0.65

-0.57

UEFI.DE vs. SNA2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEFI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the SNA2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEFI.DE and SNA2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UEFI.DESNA2.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

0.20

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.03

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.12

+0.12

Drawdowns

UEFI.DE vs. SNA2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.63%, which is greater than SNA2.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEFI.DE and SNA2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEFI.DESNA2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.63%

-17.70%

-14.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-3.97%

-12.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-11.19%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.26%

-13.01%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.90%

-14.15%

-3.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-11.16%

-3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.93%

1.69%

+9.24%

Volatility

UEFI.DE vs. SNA2.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) is 0.74%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SNA2.DE) has a volatility of 0.96%. This indicates that UEFI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNA2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEFI.DESNA2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

0.96%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.69%

3.78%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.96%

5.49%

+16.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

8.06%

+4.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

7.95%

+8.65%

UEFI.DE vs. SNA2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEFI.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SNA2.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UEFI.DE vs. SNA2.DE - Dividend Comparison

UEFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than SNA2.DE's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNA2.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist
3.50%3.74%3.48%3.07%1.40%0.72%1.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEFI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.64%1.93%2.25%2.54%1.33%0.82%1.66%1.68%2.29%1.74%0.76%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, UEFI.DE and SNA2.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UEFI.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UEFI.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SNA2.DE.

UEFI.DE tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while SNA2.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for UEFI.DE and 0.07% for SNA2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEFI.DE and SNA2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer