PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEFI.DE vs. AW1C.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEFI.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEFI.DE achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than AW1C.DE's 21.11% return.


UEFI.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.27%
1Y
1.25%
3Y*
-0.59%
5Y*
-0.43%
10Y*
0.15%

AW1C.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
10.22%
YTD
21.11%
6M
22.20%
1Y
39.06%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEFI.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UEFI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.01%-5.01%4.87%-0.30%-9.82%6.84%
AW1C.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
21.11%6.94%24.89%24.93%-14.50%30.17%

Correlation

The correlation between UEFI.DE and AW1C.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021

0.04

The correlation between UEFI.DE and AW1C.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (5 years) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEFI.DE vs. AW1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEFI.DE
UEFI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
UEFI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

AW1C.DE
AW1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AW1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AW1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEFI.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UEFI.DEAW1C.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.48

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

2.33

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

4.43

-4.35

UEFI.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEFI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the AW1C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEFI.DE and AW1C.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UEFI.DEAW1C.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

1.56

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.85

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.92

-0.92

Drawdowns

UEFI.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.63%, which is greater than AW1C.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEFI.DE and AW1C.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEFI.DEAW1C.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.63%

-22.40%

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-16.86%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-22.40%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.26%

-22.40%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.90%

-0.12%

-17.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-5.82%

-8.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.93%

8.90%

+2.03%

Volatility

UEFI.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) is 0.74%, while UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that UEFI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AW1C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEFI.DEAW1C.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

3.81%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.69%

9.14%

-5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.96%

25.24%

-3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

18.35%

-5.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

18.11%

-1.51%

UEFI.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEFI.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than AW1C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UEFI.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Dividend Comparison

UEFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while AW1C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AW1C.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEFI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.64%1.93%2.25%2.54%1.33%0.82%1.66%1.68%2.29%1.74%0.76%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEFI.DE and AW1C.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UEFI.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UEFI.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AW1C.DE.

UEFI.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while AW1C.DE is S&P 500. UEFI.DE tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for UEFI.DE and 0.15% for AW1C.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEFI.DE and AW1C.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer