PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEFE.DE vs. XQUA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEFE.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFE.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEFE.DE achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than XQUA.DE's 1.67% return.


UEFE.DE

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.09%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.04%
1Y
7.90%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*

XQUA.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.08%
YTD
1.67%
6M
0.59%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
1.89%
5Y*
0.43%
10Y*
1.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEFE.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UEFE.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.04%5.88%6.93%15.75%-6.22%2.54%-2.71%21.27%7.49%
XQUA.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D
1.67%-1.83%4.80%3.61%-12.81%6.04%-3.38%17.25%2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between UEFE.DE and XQUA.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018

0.52

The correlation between UEFE.DE and XQUA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEFE.DE vs. XQUA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEFE.DE
UEFE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
UEFE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEFE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEFE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
UEFE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEFE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

XQUA.DE
XQUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XQUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEFE.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFE.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UEFE.DEXQUA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.16

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

1.28

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

3.54

+3.54

UEFE.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEFE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the XQUA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEFE.DE and XQUA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UEFE.DEXQUA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

0.91

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.05

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.16

+0.50

Drawdowns

UEFE.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEFE.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, which is greater than XQUA.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEFE.DE and XQUA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEFE.DEXQUA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.72%

-20.18%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.93%

-4.12%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.02%

-11.44%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.46%

-16.68%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-8.97%

+7.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-8.61%

+4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

1.49%

-0.35%

Volatility

UEFE.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFE.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.93% compared to Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) at 1.13%. This indicates that UEFE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XQUA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEFE.DEXQUA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

1.13%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.64%

3.85%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46%

5.82%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.44%

8.31%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.82%

8.85%

+0.97%

UEFE.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEFE.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XQUA.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

UEFE.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Dividend Comparison

UEFE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than XQUA.DE's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
UEFE.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
4.67%5.37%7.09%8.64%6.79%8.96%9.53%9.22%0.00%0.00%
XQUA.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D
3.90%4.38%4.01%4.02%6.75%3.16%4.33%3.72%2.50%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEFE.DE and XQUA.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UEFE.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UEFE.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XQUA.DE.

UEFE.DE tracks JP Morgan Emerging Markets Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond, while XQUA.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for UEFE.DE and 0.45% for XQUA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEFE.DE and XQUA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer