PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDVD.L vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDVD.L vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDVD.L achieves a 7.37% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 20.48% return. Over the past 10 years, UDVD.L has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 8.80%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 18.41% annualized return.


UDVD.L

1D
0.28%
1M
0.99%
YTD
7.37%
6M
8.92%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
8.80%

TDIV

1D
-1.40%
1M
2.98%
YTD
20.48%
6M
16.19%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
29.65%
5Y*
17.29%
10Y*
18.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDVD.L vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
7.37%8.57%7.64%2.06%-0.33%25.05%0.77%22.65%-3.94%15.73%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
20.48%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between UDVD.L and TDIV is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between UDVD.L and TDIV has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UDVD.L vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDVD.L
TDIV

Industrials

17.5%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

17.0%

-

Utilities

14.8%

-

Financial Services

11.5%

-

Technology

8.9%
85.0%

Basic Materials

6.4%

-

Healthcare

6.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%

-

Real Estate

4.6%

-

Energy

4.5%

-

Communication Services

3.5%
13.4%

Industrials

UDVD.L
17.5%
TDIV
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

UDVD.L
17.0%
TDIV

-

Utilities

UDVD.L
14.8%
TDIV

-

Financial Services

UDVD.L
11.5%
TDIV

-

Technology

UDVD.L
8.9%
TDIV
85.0%

Basic Materials

UDVD.L
6.4%
TDIV

-

Healthcare

UDVD.L
6.2%
TDIV

-

Consumer Cyclical

UDVD.L
5.2%
TDIV

-

Real Estate

UDVD.L
4.6%
TDIV

-

Energy

UDVD.L
4.5%
TDIV

-

Communication Services

UDVD.L
3.5%
TDIV
13.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDVD.L vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDVD.L
UDVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDVD.L vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDVD.LTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

3.66

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.67

10.96

-6.29

UDVD.L vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDVD.L and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDVD.LTDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

2.01

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.83

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.88

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.84

-0.12

Drawdowns

UDVD.L vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDVD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDVD.L and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDVD.LTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-31.97%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.06%

-10.74%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-23.00%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.26%

-31.97%

+16.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.12%

-31.97%

-4.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-9.39%

+6.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-4.84%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

3.58%

-0.78%

Volatility

UDVD.L vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) is 2.62%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 9.74%. This indicates that UDVD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDVD.LTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

9.74%

-7.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

15.37%

-8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.93%

19.53%

-9.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.93%

20.86%

-6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

20.95%

-5.25%

UDVD.L vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDVD.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDVD.L vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

UDVD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than TDIV's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.21%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.17%2.03%2.24%2.13%2.15%2.36%2.01%2.27%1.78%1.83%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDVD.L and TDIV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UDVD.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UDVD.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.

UDVD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. UDVD.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UDVD.L and 0.50% for TDIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDVD.L and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer