PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDOW vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDOW vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 19.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UDOW having a 23.30% annualized return and SSO not far ahead at 24.21%.


UDOW

1D
-3.38%
1M
10.84%
YTD
12.27%
6M
12.78%
1Y
53.13%
3Y*
33.01%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
23.30%

SSO

1D
-1.40%
1M
9.75%
YTD
19.37%
6M
18.81%
1Y
52.69%
3Y*
37.56%
5Y*
19.62%
10Y*
24.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDOW vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
12.27%24.46%28.47%32.72%-32.39%65.67%-17.15%75.24%-23.86%99.07%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
19.37%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%

Correlation

The correlation between UDOW and SSO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.92

The correlation between UDOW and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

UDOW vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDOW
SSO

Financial Services

27.2%
11.8%

Industrials

18.4%
8.3%

Technology

17.1%
35.6%

Healthcare

13.1%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.9%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.8%

Energy

2.4%
3.5%

Communication Services

1.9%
11.2%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

UDOW
27.2%
SSO
11.8%

Industrials

UDOW
18.4%
SSO
8.3%

Technology

UDOW
17.1%
SSO
35.6%

Healthcare

UDOW
13.1%
SSO
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UDOW
11.6%
SSO
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

UDOW
4.4%
SSO
4.9%

Basic Materials

UDOW
4.0%
SSO
1.8%

Energy

UDOW
2.4%
SSO
3.5%

Communication Services

UDOW
1.9%
SSO
11.2%

Real Estate

UDOW

-

SSO
1.9%

Utilities

UDOW

-

SSO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDOW vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDOW
UDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
UDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDOW vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDOWSSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.91

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

12.80

-6.05

UDOW vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDOW and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDOWSSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.25

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.59

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.68

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.42

+0.12

Drawdowns

UDOW vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDOWSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.29%

-84.67%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.07%

-18.17%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.83%

-35.21%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.79%

-46.73%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.29%

-59.34%

-20.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

-1.40%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.39%

-19.57%

+5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.90%

4.13%

+3.77%

Volatility

UDOW vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.66%. This indicates that UDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDOWSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

5.66%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.61%

17.78%

+9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.12%

23.60%

+12.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.19%

33.65%

+10.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.76%

35.89%

+15.87%

UDOW vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDOW vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than SSO's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.62%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
1.21%1.38%0.95%0.95%0.83%0.26%0.19%0.61%0.73%0.13%0.26%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDOW and SSO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UDOW has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to SSO (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs SSO's -84.67%.

On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.21% vs 23.30% for UDOW. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.21% return vs 23.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UDOW.

UDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.62% for SSO.

UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UDOW and 0.87% for SSO.

SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDOW and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer